Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Press releases recorded for this federal judicial district.
Former Philadelphia Police Officer Sentenced to Prison for Fraud and Ordered to Forfeit over $653,000 in Ill-Gotten GainsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Victor Gates, 72 of Philadelphia, PA, a retired 30-year veteran of the Philadelphia Police Department, was sentenced today to serve 40 months in prison, followed by two years’ supervised release, and to pay a $15,000 fine. Gates was also ordered to forfeit $653,319.10 in proceeds from his crimes. The sentence was imposed by the Honorable Wendy Beetlestone of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Gates was convicted at trial of one count of conspiracy to commit honest services fraud, fourteen counts of honest services mail fraud, and two counts of lying to federal investigators. The charges arose from Gates’s orchestration of a seven-year bribery scheme during which he paid a Philadelphia Police detective for special access to law enforcement databases in order to build up Gates’ lucrative towing business. The evidence at trial showed that Gates’s business made monthly bribe payments by check since at least May 2008. In total, Gates paid the detective $25,200 to abuse his access to law enforcement databases. The jury also found that during the investigation, Gates lied on two occasions to federal investigators about the corrupt arrangement.
“Through his corruption and criminality, Gates has disgraced himself, embarrassed his former colleagues, and corrupted a former police detective who viewed Gates as a mentor,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “The sentence imposed today should send a message that such corruption will be vigorously prosecuted and the offenders held to account, no matter who they are or what position they hold.”
“After 30 years on the force, Victor Gates knew well that bribing a police officer was an egregious crime,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. “Nonetheless, he stuck with his scheme, ensnaring a former colleague and ignoring all ethical boundaries in order to make a buck. What a shame. Know that the FBI will continue to tenaciously investigate such corruption, and bring those involved to justice.”
“While we are saddened that a former law enforcement officer has engaged in such egregious conduct, we certainly appreciate the efforts of our federal law enforcement partners in bringing Mr. Gates to justice,” said Philadelphia Police Commissioner Richard Ross. “The investigation, arrest, and successful prosecution of Mr. Gates serves as an emphatic reminder that no one may operate outside the law, regardless of position or affiliations.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Affairs Division of the Philadelphia Police Department and was being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Eric L. Gibson.
Multiple Criminal Illegal Aliens Sentenced for Illegal Reentry to the United States After DeportationRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain today announced sentences in three separate immigration cases in which the defendants, who are all convicted criminals, were also convicted for the additional crime of illegally reentering the United States after having been previously deported. The three cases are United States v. Marcos Mendoza-Jimenez; United States v. Walter Morales-Lopez; and United States v. Melvin Ramos-Moreira.
United States v. Marcos Mendoza-Jimenez
Marcos Mendoza-Jimenez, 43, of West Chester, was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment, followed by immediate and permanent removal from the United States. Mendoza-Jimenez was charged by federal indictment in October 2018 with one count of illegal reentry after deportation. Mendoza-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, illegally entered the United States sometime before 2004. While living here illegally, he was convicted in 2004 for theft, assault, and false imprisonment based on an altercation with a man who Mendoza-Jimenez held captive in a car for several hours and threatened with a hammer. After his first conviction, Mendoza-Jimenez was deported and removed from the United States. The defendant returned illegally sometime in 2016. In 2018, he also assaulted a female with whom he was in a relationship.
United States v. Walter Morales-Lopez
Walter Morales-Lopez, 33, of Kennett Square, was sentenced to time served, approximately six months after pleading guilty to one count of illegal reentry after deportation. Morales-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States illegally sometime prior to 2011, when he was removed from the United States for the first time. At some point thereafter, the defendant illegally reentered the United States and engaged in a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. He was subsequently convicted on state charges of statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors, and luring a child into his car. As a result of his federal conviction on the immigration crime, the defendant will be immediately transferred into the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immediate permanent removal from the United States.
United States v. Melvin Roberto Ramos-Moreira
Melvin Roberto Ramos-Moreira, 24, of Lancaster, was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day in prison after pleading guilty to one count of illegal reentry after deportation. Ramos-Moreira, a native and citizen of Honduras, entered the United States sometime prior to 2013. In 2013, he was found in the United States, convicted in state court for stalking, and deported for the first time. At some point thereafter, Ramos-Moreira reentered the United States illegally. In 2018, he was charged and pleaded guilty to state charges of stalking, possessing an instrument of crime, invasion of privacy, and harassment following an incident where he followed a female victim shopping in a store and took pictures up the victim’s skirt.
“Those who enter our country illegally are not above the law – nobody is,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “These defendants decided they did not have to follow the rules. They not only flouted our nation’s immigration laws, but also committed additional serious crimes while they were here illegally. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to uphold the rule of law and ensure our nation’s immigration laws are enforced.”
“All three defendants were previously removed from the United States and have been convicted of crimes: Mendoza-Jimenez for assaulting and stealing from a man whom he threatened with a hammer, Morales-Lopez for sexual assault, Ramos-Moreira for a stalking conviction,” said Simona L. Flores, Field Office Director for ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) Philadelphia. “ICE and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania will seek to prosecute and remove dangerous criminals who break United States law. Our officers continue to work daily with professionalism and integrity, enforcing the law as set forth by Congress.”
These cases were investigated by ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations and are being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mary Kay Costello, Mary E. Crawley, and Nancy Beam Winter.
Civil Lawsuit Filed to Enjoin Local Farm’s Continuing Misbranding of Meat/Poultry Products and Evasion of Food Safety LawsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that his office has filed a civil lawsuit to enjoin Miller’s Organic Farm of Bird-in-Hand, Pennsylvania, and its owner, Amos Miller, from continuing to violate federal food safety laws. The violations include Miller’s selling non-federally-inspected, misbranded meat and poultry products to consumers located throughout the United States.
The United States brings the action on behalf of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. FSIS is responsible for ensuring that commercially sold meat, poultry, and egg products are safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged. A principal way that FSIS fulfills its mission is by inspecting meat and poultry products before they reach consumers.
The suit is part of the United States’ continuing efforts to bring Miller’s into compliance with federal food safety laws. In late 2015, for example, the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates milk: (1) isolated and identified Listeria monocytogenes (L. mono) bacteria in samples of Miller’s raw milk; (2) through whole genome sequencing, found the bacteria to be genetically similar to L. mono in two individuals who had developed listeriosis (with one dying) after consuming raw milk; and (3) named Miller’s as the “likely source” of those infections.
In follow-up, FSIS sought to assess whether L. mono might be contaminating Miller’s meat and poultry products. But Mr. Miller refused to grant FSIS entry to the farm’s meat-and-poultry-related facilities, even after the agency served him with a subpoena. He erroneously contended that, as a self-organized private membership association, Miller’s is beyond the reach of federal food safety regulation.
The United States then sued Miller’s in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to enforce the subpoena and USDA’s access rights under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) and the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA). See United States v. Miller’s Organic Farm and Amos Miller, EDPA No. 16-cv-2731. After the court enforced the subpoena, FSIS cited Miller’s with FMIA and PPIA misbranding and other violations, which have since continued. This is believed to be the first-ever suit of its kind where FSIS is seeking an injunction against a so-called “private membership association” farm business to enforce food safety laws.
“With today’s lawsuit, food establishments in this District are on further notice that my Office will not ignore efforts to evade federal food safety laws and to hinder agencies like FSIS from carrying out their public safety missions,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “We will not allow commercial sellers to ignore the rule of law, make up their own sets of rules, and attempt to hide behind a private-membership-association structure in an effort to thwart federal laws. Congress enacted food safety laws to ensure that the nation’s food supply is safe, wholesome, and properly labeled and packaged. It’s our job to enforce those democratically enacted laws, which we will do in this case.”
“FSIS investigators work hard every day to protect consumers,” said Carmen Rottenberg, FSIS Administrator. “We take our job to protect public health very seriously, with swift action to ensure that American families have safe food to eat. Flagrant failure to meet the regulations will not be tolerated.”
Assistant United States Attorney Gerald Sullivan is litigating this case on behalf of the United States.
Lehigh Valley Cocaine and Methamphetamine Trafficker Convicted at TrialRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Jerome Lamont Duggan, 46, of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was convicted at trial of one count of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine; one count of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine; one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine; one count of possession with intent to distribute 28 grams or more of cocaine base (“crack”); and one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Sentencing will be held before United States District Judge Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.
During an investigation into the drug trafficking activities of Larry Roger Beitler, Jr. (charged elsewhere), law enforcement determined through wiretap interceptions that Beitler had purchased quantities of methamphetamine from the defendant. Further evidence, including additional wiretapped phone calls, intercepted postal packages, and surveillance, established that Duggan was an active drug trafficker between March 2016 and May 5, 2016, and further established the location of his stash house of drugs.
“The Lehigh Valley is safer now that this defendant has been brought to justice. Stopping the trafficking of deadly drugs is a top priority of my Office and of the Department of Justice, and successful prosecutions of cases like this remain a key part of our deterrence strategy,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “My Office remains committed to working with our law enforcement partners to find, convict, and imprison the criminals who flood our streets with poisonous drugs.”
This case was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Kishan Nair.
Philadelphia Man Convicted at Trial of Trafficking Cocaine Near SchoolRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Carlos Ramos, 34, of Philadelphia, was convicted yesterday by a federal jury of one count of attempted possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine within 1,000 feet of an elementary school.
On September 11, 2018, U.S. Postal Inspectors intercepted a suspicious priority mail package at the Philadelphia mail distribution center. After receiving a court-ordered search warrant, law enforcement opened the package and discovered over one kilogram of cocaine inside the package. On September 13, 2018, law enforcement conducted a controlled delivery of the priority package, which also contained a court-authorized GPS tracker and beeper device inside of it. The package was hand-delivered to the defendant, Carlos Ramos. A few minutes after delivery, the beeper went off, indicating that the priority mail package had been opened. When law enforcement knocked on the door, no one responded. A law enforcement officer conducting surveillance in the rear of the house observed an arm in a white jacket reach out of a second floor window and throw a white package out of the window into the backyard of the adjoining property. Law enforcement retrieved the package from the adjacent yard. Upon entry into the house, law enforcement encountered Ramos exiting the rear bedroom on the second floor and wearing a white jacket. A sweep of Ramos’ hands with a black light revealed the presence of theft detection powder on Ramos’ hands. Agents found the opened priority mail package, a knife, and some of the plastic wrapping material at the top of the stairs. The home is across the street from an elementary school.
“The defendant received over one kilogram of cocaine in the mail when he lived across the street from an elementary school,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “He clearly has no respect for the rule of law as well as a total disregard for the safety of our children. We are grateful that the jury held him accountable for his crimes.”
The case was investigated by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the Philadelphia Police Department, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Justin Ashenfelter and Frank A. Labor III.
Philadelphia Business Owner Indicted for Multi-Million Dollar Fraudulent Loan SchemeRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Gary Frank, age 48, of Philadelphia and Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, was charged today by indictment with wire fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and money laundering, stemming from a massive fraudulent loan scheme.
According to the indictment, for over a decade, the defendant executed a complex and sophisticated scheme to defraud numerous victims. The defendant owned and operated a Bala Cynwyd business named the Legal Coverage Group, Ltd., which contracted with employers desiring to offer a legal plan to their employees as part of their employee benefits plans. It is alleged that the defendant tricked his victims into believing that the Legal Coverage Group was a rapidly growing leader in the legal plan industry, generating hundreds of millions of dollars of annual revenue and employing hundreds of individuals. In reality, however, the Legal Coverage Group experienced virtually no growth from approximately 2006 through 2017, generating only several thousand dollars of annual revenue. Through this fraud, the defendant allegedly obtained over $30 million in loans, which he used to live an extravagant lifestyle.
According to the indictment, the defendant’s largest victims were banks and financial institutions, which loaned the Legal Coverage Group millions of dollars based upon the defendant’s fraudulent misrepresentations and false documents that he created. The defendant also allegedly deceived many individuals and other entities, including several of his close friends, his company’s staff members, its advisors, customers, vendors, and local charities.
“This Office takes allegations of financial fraud and loan fraud very seriously,’ said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “As alleged, the defendant obtained millions of dollars from lenders and friends, only to spend it on his lavish personal lifestyle. My Office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to protect innocent individuals and businesses from being victimized by fraud.”
"This defendant allegedly lived high on the hog for over a decade by fraudulently misrepresenting his business practices and prowess," said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. "The FBI will continue to diligently investigate and hold accountable those foolish enough to engage in financial fraud."
If convicted, the defendant faces a maximum possible sentence of 935 years imprisonment, full restitution, a fine, and a period of supervised release.
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Patrick J. Murray.
An indictment, information or complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Convicted Felon in Philadelphia Found Guilty at Trial of Illegally Possessing Loaded FirearmRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Nafis Mullins, 27, of Philadelphia, was convicted today by a federal jury of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
On May 1, 2018, at approximately 11:40 pm, Philadelphia police officers were patrolling the area of 24th and Oxford Streets in Philadelphia when they encountered a group of men on Oxford Street. When the officers stopped to ask the group what they were doing, all of the men turned to acknowledge the officers, except for the defendant. Instead, the defendant kept his back to the officers with his hands in the front pouch pocket of his bright orange sweatshirt. An officer asked the defendant to turn around and take his hands out of his sweatshirt, and the defendant failed to comply and fled from the police. As he ran, the defendant threw a dark object (later determined to be a firearm) up and to the left with his left hand before jumping over a small cinderblock wall in an attempt to conceal himself. After the defendant was stopped, law enforcement recovered the loaded firearm. The defendant has several prior felony convictions which prohibit him from possessing a firearm.
“Reducing violent crime and keeping illegal guns off our streets are top priorities for the Department of Justice and my Office,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “The defendant, who was a convicted felon multiples times over, knew that he could not legally possess a gun, but decided the law did not apply to him. Thank you to our law enforcement partners for enforcing the law and helping keep our community safe from violence.”
“The investigation, arrest, and successful prosecution of Nafis Mullins serves as evidence of the effectiveness of strong and consistent collaboration between law enforcement agencies,” said Richard J. Ross Jr., Philadelphia Police Commissioner. “With the conviction and impending sentencing, Mullins, who is a recidivist offender, will no longer be able to re-offend in our neighborhoods. This, along with the continuing efforts of the Project Safe Neighborhoods partner agencies, will have an appreciable impact on the quality of life of the residents of our great city.”
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a nationwide program by the Department of Justice that has been historically successful in bringing together all levels of law enforcement to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. The Department has made turning the tide of rising violent crime in America a top priority. In October 2017, to address this crime trend, the Department announced the reinvigoration of PSN.
The case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Philadelphia Police Department, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Katherine Driscoll.
Fostering Corporate Cooperation and Communication to Promote the Rule of LawRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain was honored to speak today at the Association of Corporate Counsel of Greater Philadelphia’s Summit for General Counsel and Chief Legal Officers. The event was held at the Loews Philadelphia Hotel. Richard E. Coe, U.S. Attorney McSwain’s former law partner at Drinker Biddle, introduced U.S. Attorney McSwain.
*****
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery
Thank you, Rick, for that kind introduction, and for inviting me to speak today to this distinguished group.
Opportunities like this serve as an important reflection point for me; they give me a reason to set aside some time, outside of the day-to-day hustle and bustle, to pause and think about the goals and priorities that I have for the U.S. Attorney’s Office and force me to evaluate our progress.
Obviously, my main priority, and our core function, is to uphold the rule of law. I firmly believe that building trust between the public and my Office is critical to success in that regard. That’s one of the reasons why I think it’s important to speak at events like this – to let community partners get a sense of who we are as prosecutors; what my Office stands for; and what our mindset is as we work every day to fulfill our mission. And by “community partners,” I am referring today to you and the companies and clients that you work for. You and your colleagues are the business leaders that drive economic growth in the greater Philadelphia area.
Which brings me to the topic of my remarks: fostering cooperation and communication to promote the rule of law. I see today’s summit as an opportunity to convey two important messages.
First, I want to thank you. The work that you do to promote your company’s compliance with federal law is incredibly important. In a way, you serve a crucial law enforcement function every day by working to ensure that your companies comply with the law. You are on the front lines of promoting the rule of law in your organizations. And in performing that function, I want you to know that you have my support and my gratitude.
Now, admittedly, my second message will take a little longer to communicate, even though it is related to the first. In a nutshell, I want you to know that I value communication between your organizations and my Office and I value the cooperation of your organizations with my Office. I want you, our region’s corporate leaders, to consider yourself as a potential partner of my Office in detecting and combatting corporate misconduct and crime.
Let me explain that further.
The spirit of cooperation that I’m talking about is reflected, for example, in some of the recent policy changes implemented at the Department of Justice level. Thanks to a series of initiatives and policy adjustments, the Department is now making white collar prosecutions and enforcement more effective and efficient.
There’s one area in particular that I want to emphasize today – that is, recent changes to the Department’s policies concerning cooperation credit in criminal and civil matters. Most – if not all – of you are familiar with the Yates Memo, which was issued in September 2015 by then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. Broadly speaking, the Memo was designed to seek accountability from individuals for corporate misconduct. As Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein explained when he announced changes to the Yates Memo in November 2018, the revised policy came out of a working group comprised of Department employees, law enforcement agents, and private sector stakeholders. So the changes were the product of collaboration between government and private sector lawyers and communication about priorities, concerns, and past experiences under the Yates Memo and the policy guidance that followed.
The revised policies regarding cooperation credit continue to emphasize – in both criminal and civil cases – the importance of full corporate disclosure and individual accountability. Both are cornerstones of the Department’s approach to dealing with corporate misconduct, but the current policies reflect a more nuanced, common-sense approach to determining when cooperation credit can and should be offered.
The Yates Memo directed DOJ attorneys to offer cooperation credit in criminal and civil matters only if corporations identified and shared with DOJ all relevant facts about the individuals involved in corporate misconduct. Anything considered less than 100% disclosure of every person even tangentially involved and every fact about what they did disqualified the corporation from credit. The result, as Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein acknowledged, was often prolonged, costly investigations that ultimately led to the same result as the current standard – with the government applying notions of fairness and the rule of law to hold only the most responsible parties accountable.
The current policy now creates some flexibility where there was none before, and it reflects the reality inherent in these types of investigations: identifying every single person and every single fact relevant to alleged misconduct is not only impractical, but also unnecessary to achieve the Department’s goals. So, under the current policy, companies can receive cooperation credit in criminal cases where the company has identified every individual “substantially involved in or responsible for the criminal conduct.”
The policy revisions also provide meaningful changes to DOJ’s approach to resolving civil cases. Prior DOJ policy prohibited our civil attorneys from offering any cooperation credit to a company in the civil context unless the company complied with the all-or-nothing approach of the Yates Memo. But now, our civil attorneys have the ability to offer partial cooperation credit in civil cases in certain circumstances, and can offer full cooperation credit when the company identifies those “substantially involved.” As Mr. Rosenstein observed, the binary choice of full credit or no credit embodied in the Yates Memo “delayed resolution while providing little or no benefit.” Instead of furthering the goal in civil cases of recovering money, the prior policy drained our resources and resulted in prolonged investigations.
All told, these and other revisions reflect a measured approach that balances the competing interests at stake. And yes – these policies can promote collaboration and communication between our organizations. How so? Because they afford companies a more realistic path towards receiving credit and allow DOJ attorneys to focus efforts on identifying targets who are the true wrongdoers – those who committed, directed or supervised the underlying misconduct and who warrant punishment. And they restore a measure of discretion to DOJ attorneys in deciding what information they must obtain during an investigation.
These policies promote the sort of deterrence that the Department and my Office want to see in the corporate community. The most effective way to deter corporate misconduct is to punish those individuals who are actually responsible for it – most seriously, those individuals who actually committed a crime. Within your organization, I want you to focus your attention on that and help me and my Office get to the bottom of the issue, as quickly as possible.
As these new policies are applied on a case-by-case basis, rest assured that my Office welcomes an open dialogue with you and your clients as we perform our core function – to enforce the rule of law and ensure that individuals substantially involved in corporate wrongdoing are identified, prosecuted, and punished. I understand that most companies want to do the right thing. And I understand that the people in this room – highly educated and successful legal professionals who take your ethical responsibilities seriously and have taken an oath to uphold the law – certainly want to do the right thing. As Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein has stated: “companies that self-report, cooperate, and remediate the harm they caused will be rewarded. Companies that condone or ignore misconduct will pay the price.” In large part, the choice is up to you, and I hope and expect that you will make the right choice, should you find yourself confronted with it.
The benefits that can flow from open lines of communication and a cooperative approach are clear if your client is the target of a criminal or civil investigation. But these benefits are not limited to that situation. Indeed, I want you to think of my Office as an important ally when your business has been victimized – say, for example, by employees or customers who are stealing from your company. Unfortunately, these situations are all too common. And when they occur, it’s important to view my Office as a critical resource – as a partner whose interests are aligned with yours.
Here are a few examples of what I mean. This past year, my Office prosecuted high-level GlaxoSmithKline employees, scientists who were Chinese nationals, for conspiracy to steal trade secrets from the company. These employees were helping to develop biopharmaceutical products – assets that typically cost in excess of $1 billion to research and develop – and then stealing them from GSK and sending them to China. In doing so, these criminals were attempting to destroy the lifeblood of the company – stealing its intellectual property and engaging in economic warfare.
GSK was an excellent partner with my Office, working shoulder-to-shoulder with our prosecutors and cooperating so that we could collect the necessary information to hold the responsible individuals accountable. And we did just that. Dr. Tao Li, Dr. Yu Xue, and Dr. Yan Mei, were prosecuted for their crimes; all have pled guilty and await sentencing.
Another example of this collaborative approach is found in the insider trading case involving former Philadelphia Eagle, Mychal Kendricks, and his friend, Damilare Sonoiki. Mr. Sonoiki worked at a global investment firm and used material, non-public information to turn an illegal profit, and provided such information to Mr. Kendricks to do the same. Mr. Sonoiki’s former corporate employer fully cooperated with my Office and with the Securities and Exchange Commission during our investigation into this unlawful conduct. The company’s cooperation allowed us to uncover key information, and quickly identify and prosecute the wrongdoers. Mr. Kendricks and Mr. Sonoiki have pleaded guilty and await sentencing.
A good example of a recent crime prevention initiative is our public service campaign to deter Hobbs Act robberies in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Our Office is working with local and national convenience stores, drugstores, and fast food chains to alert the public (and criminals) that if you walk into a business and attempt to rob it, we can prosecute that crime federally – and the potential penalties are steep, especially if the crime involves a gun. This partnership is crucial to communicating a unified, powerful deterrent message – that “a federal crime means federal prison time” for the perpetrators. We will continue to work with our corporate partners to create public service announcements and promotional materials that highlight our commitment to keeping our streets and storefronts safe.
In conclusion, we at the U.S. Attorney’s Office take very seriously our responsibility to investigate and prosecute criminals who commit corporate misconduct. As I have pledged from day one, my Office will enforce the law in a fair and non-partisan manner, regardless of who you are, where you come from, or how much power or influence you have. We will apply that neutral principle to corporations and senior leaders who commit crimes or direct others to do so.
But the other takeaway from my remarks today, I hope, is that my Office and I are also here to help you do your job. As I said previously, most companies and their leaders want to do the right thing. Fostering communication and cooperation will only help us get to the right result – which is to hold wrongdoers accountable and to deter misconduct.
Again, I appreciate the opportunity to be with you today. Thank you for your attention, and thank you for your commitment to the rule of law.
Two Individuals Charged in Health Care Fraud Scheme Involving Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center with Multiple Pennsylvania LocationsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – First Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams announced today the filing of federal charges in connection with a health care fraud scheme involving Liberation Way, a drug and alcohol rehabilitation organization that had treatment centers in Yardley, Bala Cynwyd, and Fort Washington, Pennsylvania. Dr. Ramesh Sarvaiya, 64, of Voorhees, New Jersey, and Jessie Peters, 44, of Lake Worth, Florida, charged separately by Information, are each charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 371. The federal charges were announced at a press conference announcing related state charges filed by the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General.
The federal charging documents allege each man participated in an elaborate scheme involving thousands of medically-unnecessary urine tests ordered by Dr. Sarvaiya and processed by a lab in Florida associated with Peters. The charging documents allege that defendant Sarvaiya ordered tests to be performed on samples obtained from Liberation Way patients, even though Sarvaiya never treated those patients. The tests were then sent to Florida-based laboratories for a battery of unnecessary tests, and Peters allegedly paid kickbacks to principals at Liberation Way in return for directing the samples to his company.
If convicted, each defendant faces a maximum possible sentence of five years’ imprisonment and a fine of $250,000, along with restitution of millions to the victims of this fraud.
“With these charges, we intend to send a clear message to those seeking to build their fortunes on fraud and the despair of individuals battling addiction: health care fraud and the opioid epidemic are major priorities for the United States Attorney’s Office, and your illegal actions will be uncovered,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Williams at the press conference earlier today. “We are honored to work together with the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General, the Florida State Attorney’s Office, as well as with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Health and Human Services–Office of the Inspector General, and the Office of Personnel Management–Office of the Inspector General, on these critical issues that impact each and every individual as a health care consumer.”
“It’s shameful when medical professionals prioritize profits over patients,” said Christian Zajac, Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “For those involved, insurance schemes must seem like a convenient way to cash in. Just know that the FBI, alongside our state and federal partners, is committed to finding, investigating and bringing to justice anyone defrauding this country’s vital healthcare system. In other words: you won’t get away with it forever.”
"Today's fine work by the Department of Justice, OPM-OIG criminal investigators, and our other law enforcement partners demonstrates our office's commitment to combatting fraud and abuse in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program," said Thomas W. South, Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. "We will continue to aggressively investigate and prosecute all individuals who seek to steal taxpayer dollars and drive up health care costs for Federal employees and their families."
“Combating health care fraud and the opioid epidemic are top priorities, said Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge, of the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS-OIG). HHS-OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to protect the integrity of all HHS Programs.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Personnel Management, and the Department of Labor, in conjunction with the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General and the Florida State Attorney’s Office. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Nancy Winter.
An Indictment, Information or Criminal Complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Agrees to Resolve Federal Civil Rights Investigation into Complaints About Alternative Education ProgramsRead the Press Release
The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorney’s Offices for the Western, Middle, and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania today announced a settlement agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) to resolve a federal civil rights investigation into complaints about PDE’s statewide system of alternative education programs, known as Alternative Education for Disruptive Youth (AEDY).
"All students should be provided an opportunity to succeed and are entitled to learn in an educational environment free from discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division. “We commend PDE’s cooperation throughout our investigation and for its commitment to ensure that students with disabilities and English learners are not prevented from learning opportunities afforded to other students. All students should receive the lawfully-required help they need to participate equally in schools.”
“Pennsylvania must ensure that children with disabilities are not placed in an alternative disciplinary program simply because they have a disability,” said United States Attorney Freed. “We applaud the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for implementing numerous changes to its AEDY Programs already, which, coupled with this agreement, will improve the education of children with disabilities and give all children the opportunity to learn English in AEDY Programs.”
“Federal law does not allow schools to discipline students because of their disability, or to deprive them of an opportunity to learn English,” said United States Attorney William M. McSwain when announcing the resolution for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. “This agreement protects their civil rights, and comes with laudable cooperation by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.”
The investigation was conducted under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits state and local government entities, including public schools, from discriminating based on disability. In addition, the Justice Department investigated under the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, which prohibits a state from denying equal educational opportunity based on national origin by failing to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by students in an instructional program.
Under the settlement agreement, PDE will monitor the AEDY system to ensure that students are not placed in AEDY in a manner that discriminates based on disability; that they are not denied equal educational opportunities; and that students with disabilities are transferred back to their home schools in a timely manner. In addition, the agreement will require Pennsylvania to ensure that local educational agencies provide appropriate language assistance services to English Learner (EL) students. The United States will monitor compliance with the terms of the agreement.
Additional information about the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department is available on its website at www.justice.gov/crt.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Agrees to Resolve Federal Civil Rights Investigation into Alternative Education ProgramsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – The U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of Pennsylvania announced jointly today that the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has agreed to resolve a federal civil rights investigation into its statewide system of alternative education programs, known as Alternative Education for Disruptive Youth. Under Pennsylvania law, students in grades 6 through 12 can be referred to these programs for temporary placements when they meet statutory criteria. These programs are separate from students’ usual general education programs, and do not typically offer the same access to instructional programs or activities.
The United States Department of Justice received complaints that these alternative education programs discriminated against students based on disability and failed to provide appropriate services to students who are learning English as a second language. In response, the Department of Justice investigated PDE’s approval and oversight of these programs across Pennsylvania.
The federal investigation arose under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits state and local government entities, including public schools, from discriminating based on disability. In addition, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 prohibits a state from denying equal educational opportunity based on national origin by failing to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in an instructional program.
Under the settlement agreement, PDE will take measures designed to remedy the complaints. The agreement requires PDE to ensure that students with disabilities receive individual assessments to determine whether they are being placed in alternative education programs because of their disability. The agreement also requires PDE to monitor whether these programs have timely transferred students with disabilities back to their home schools. In addition, the agreement requires PDE to guarantee that local educational agencies attempt appropriate interventions before referring students with disabilities to alternative education programs, and to ensure that students are not placed in these programs solely because of disability.
The agreement will also require PDE to ensure that local educational agencies establish a service plan for students who are learning English in alternative education programs to ensure that they receive appropriate language assistance services. PDE will also improve its process for receiving and responding to complaints from parents or others regarding alternative education programs, and revise its non-discrimination policies and data monitoring practices to comply with federal law.
“Federal law does not allow schools to discipline students because of their disability, or to deprive them of an opportunity to learn English,” said United States Attorney William M. McSwain when announcing the resolution for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. “This agreement protects their civil rights, and comes with laudable cooperation by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.”
“Pennsylvania must ensure that children with disabilities are not placed in an alternative disciplinary program simply because they have a disability,” said David J. Freed, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. “We applaud the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for implementing numerous changes to its AEDY Programs already, which, coupled with this agreement, will improve the education of children with disabilities and give all children the opportunity to learn English in AEDY Programs.”
“All students should be provided an opportunity to succeed and are entitled to learn in an educational environment free from discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division. “We commend PDE’s cooperation throughout our investigation and for its commitment to ensure that students with disabilities and English learners are not prevented from learning opportunities afforded to other students. All students should receive the lawfully-required help they need to participate equally in schools.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael S. Macko handled the case, working jointly with the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael Butler and Jennifer Andrade from the Middle and Western Districts of Pennsylvania, respectively.
Felon Convicted at Trial for Illegal Possession of a Loaded Firearm in PhiladelphiaRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that James Hill, of Philadelphia, PA, was convicted at trial of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Sentencing is scheduled before United States District Judge Gerald McHugh.
At trial, the government presented evidence that in the early morning hours of July 8, 2018, Philadelphia police officers found the defendant in possession of a .9mm Sig Sauer pistol loaded with fourteen live rounds in the magazine. Further investigation revealed that the defendant was barred from possessing a firearm because he had a previous felony conviction.
“Reducing violent crime is a top priority of my Office and of the Department of Justice, and successful prosecutions of cases like this remain a key part of our deterrence strategy,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “My Office remains committed to working with the Philadelphia Police Department to clear the Philadelphia streets of firearms in the hands of convicted felons, which undeniably pose a serious threat to public safety in our City.”
“The investigation, arrest, and successful prosecution of James Hill serves as evidence of the effectiveness of strong and consistent collaboration between law enforcement agencies,” said Richard J. Ross, Jr., Philadelphia Police Commissioner. “With the conviction and impending sentencing, a recidivist offender will no longer be able to re-offend in our neighborhoods. This, along with the continuing efforts of the Project Safe Neighborhoods partner agencies, will have an appreciable impact on the quality of life of the residents of our great city.”
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a nationwide program by the Department of Justice that has been historically successful in bringing together all levels of law enforcement to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. The Department has made turning the tide of rising violent crime in America a top priority. In October 2017, to address this crime trend, the Department announced the reinvigoration of PSN. For more information about PSN, visit our website.
The case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jeanine Linehan.
Pennsylvania Return Preparer Sentenced to PrisonRead the Press Release
A Yeadon, Pennsylvania, resident was sentenced today to 12 months and 1 day in prison for filing false tax returns and conspiring to defraud the United States, announced Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman of the Justice Department’s Tax Division, United States Attorney William M. McSwain, and Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Special Agent in Charge Guy Ficco.
On Oct. 12, 2018, Deron Joe was found guilty of one count of conspiring to defraud the United States by preparing and filing false tax returns and 11 counts of aiding and assisting in the filing of false tax returns for the 2007, 2008, and 2009 tax years. Court documents and evidence presented at trial showed that Joe co-owned and operated Edron Tax Professionals with his co-conspirator. From 2007 through 2010, Joe and his co-conspirator prepared tax returns for clients that falsely claimed employee business expenses and other unwarranted deductions. The false deductions allowed the co-conspirators to inflate clients’ refunds by thousands of dollars. Joe prepared the false tax returns with inflated refunds in order to grow his clientele.
The sentence was imposed by U.S. District Judge Petrese B. Tucker for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Judge Tucker also sentenced Joe to three years of supervised release.
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Zuckerman and U.S. Attorney McSwain commended agents of the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation, who investigated the case, and Department of Justice Tax Division Trial Attorneys Christopher P. O’Donnell and Kathryn D. Sparks, who prosecuted the case.
“Straw Hat Bandit” Richard Boyle Convicted of 11 Bank Robberies at TrialRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Richard Boyle, 59, of Doylestown, PA was convicted today by a federal jury of 11 separate bank robberies, 10 counts of brandishing, using, and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, and 10 counts of money laundering. The sentencing hearing is scheduled on July 15, 2019 before the Honorable Gene E.K. Pratter.
The defendant was a serial bank robber, sometimes referred to as the “Straw Hat Bandit.” During 11 separate bank robberies, the defendant stole a total of $495,686. He was able to steal that stunning total by threats of violence, including taking over the bank and forcing bank employees at gunpoint to open the vaults and cash-rich ATM machines. The defendant made careful plans to avoid apprehension, including wearing disguises, gloves, and even spreading bleach on the floor of the banks to conceal his DNA. Immediately prior to certain bank robberies, the defendant attempted to slow the police response time to the bank robbery alarms by calling police or security about false reports, including a bomb threat at a country club, a planned attack at a mall, and a man with a gun at Temple University. After the robberies, the defendant laundered the proceeds of his robberies by routing the funds through his photography business, Sky Eye View, in an attempt to conceal the source of this income.
“The defendant’s conduct in this case was outrageous,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “From robbing banks and holding innocent bank employees at gunpoint to calling in hoax threats to divert law enforcement resources and slow response time, Boyle had no regard for the safety of anyone in the community. He only cared about lining his own pockets with stolen cash. We are grateful that the jury held him accountable for his many crimes.”
“Eight and a half years ago, Richard Boyle stood in a different courtroom, having confessed to a string of bank robberies,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. “He said he wished he could’ve made better choices. But after serving out his prison sentence, he was soon robbing banks again--this time, in disguises and at gunpoint. Given the chance to do and be better, he instead chose to escalate his crimes. In doing so, he terrorized the employees of nearly a dozen banks and put people’s lives at risk. The FBI appreciates that this jury, having weighed the considerable evidence against Mr. Boyle, chose to find him guilty as charged.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Robert Livermore and Sean McDonnell.
Philadelphia Woman Indicted on Child Pornography and Online Enticement ChargesRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Linda Paolini, 43, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was charged today by Indictment with two counts of manufacturing and attempted manufacturing of child pornography and one count of online enticement of a minor.
The charges arise out of a telephone tip received by the FBI. Defendant Paolini, who was pretending to be an underage girl, communicated through Instagram with an underage boy, soliciting him for videos of him engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Over the course of months, she and her victim exchanged over 50,000 Instagram messages, including explicit and sexually-charged chats. On January 22, 2019, Paolini was arrested by federal authorities, was charged by criminal complaint the next day, and, on January 28, was ordered detained pending trial.
If convicted, Paolini faces life imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of at least 15 years, a mandatory term of supervised release of at least 5 years but up to a lifetime of supervised release, a $750,000 fine, and $15,300 in special assessments
“The facts alleged in this indictment present an all-too-familiar scenario – an adult using the Internet and social media to lure and abuse children,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “The Department of Justice’s Project Safe Childhood program – a nationwide initiative to combat child sexual exploitation and abuse – marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. The investigation and prosecution of this defendant is part of our successful enforcement in this area.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Michael J. Rinaldi.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Eight Reading Residents Indicted on 21 Counts of Drug Distribution, Firearms OffensesRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that eight individuals from Reading were indicted yesterday by a federal grand jury on 21 counts of drug distribution and firearms offenses. The individuals are:
- Jesus Feliciano-Trinidad, a/k/a “Chewy,” a/k/a “Che,” 29;
- Sharon Melendez-Ortiz, a/k/a “La Rubia,” 39;
- Fitzgerald Daliot-Rios, 29;
- Yomar Velazquez-Figueroa, a/k/a “Negrito,” 21;
- Dewayne Quinones, a/k/a “Hombre,” 25;
- Gisela Mendez, 42;
- Mariela Alvarado, a/k/a “Onyx,” 38; and
- Owen Malave-Medina, 22.
The charges stem from a months’ long investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Berks County District Attorney’s Office, the Berks County Detectives, the Reading Police Department, and the FBI into the receipt, processing, and distribution of a wide variety of drugs including methamphetamine, heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, and crack cocaine. According to the indictment, the defendants used a number of buildings, residences, firearms, and acts of violence to further their drug dealing efforts in and around the Reading area. The indictment further alleges that various defendants turned to proposed violence, conspiring to shoot certain individuals and commit a kidnapping in February 2018.
If convicted, defendants Feliciano-Trinidad, Melendez-Ortiz, Velazquez-Figueroa, Daliot-Rios, Alvarado, and Malave-Medina face up to life imprisonment. If convicted, defendants Quinones and Mendez face up to 40 years imprisonment.
“These are serious federal charges with serious federal penalties,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “My Office is committed to working with the Berks County District Attorney’s Office and all of our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners to keep the Reading community safe.”
“If convicted of the alleged crimes, this drug trafficking organization would be one of the most violent organizations that we have ever dealt with in Berks County,” said Berks County District Attorney John. T. Adams.
“Violent drug gangs have such a corrosive effect on society,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “Their crimes affect people’s peace of mind and quality of life. The FBI is committed to supporting our local law enforcement partners as we all work toward safer communities. We’re determined to make a difference, one corner, one block, one neighborhood at a time.”
The case was investigated by the Berks County District Attorney’s Office, the Berks County Detectives, the Reading Police Department, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jonathan B. Ortiz and Kelly A. Lewis Fallenstein, and Special Assistant United States Attorney Rosalynda Michetti.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Philadelphia-Area Doctor Pleads Guilty to Unlawfully Distributing OxycodoneRead the Press Release
A Philadelphia-area doctor pleaded guilty today to illegal distribution of oxycodone.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Special Agent in Charge Michael T. Harpster of the FBI’s Philadelphia Field Office, Special Agent in Charge Maureen Dixon of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General’s (HHS-OIG) Philadelphia Regional Office, Special Agent in Charge Jonathan A. Wilson of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Philadelphia Field Division and U.S. Marshal David B. Webb of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania made the announcement.
Richard Ira Mintz, D.O., 69, of Dresher, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty to eight counts of distributing controlled substances outside the scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose before U.S. District Court Judge Michael M. Baylson of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 11.
“Richard Ira Mintz violated both his professional duty and the law by selling prescriptions for addictive opioids for individuals he never examined who had no medical need for the drugs,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski. “Halting the deadly scourge of opioids requires aggressively pursuing corrupt medical professionals who contribute to the opioid epidemic — and that is precisely why we created this regional Strike Force. I want to commend our prosecutors and all of our Strike Force partners for their ongoing work on this vital law enforcement priority.”
“Instead of adhering to his oath to ‘do no harm,’ this doctor chose to use his prescription pad to do just the opposite: with every stroke of the pen, he pushed dangerous opioids onto the streets and turned an illegal profit,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “It is because of the partnership between the Department of Justice’s Criminal Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney Offices of the District of New Jersey and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that this doctor will be held accountable for his actions. “
“Yet another long-time physician is caught illicitly pushing pills,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Harpster. “Despite all that education and experience, at some point Richard Mintz’s priorities shifted and his ethics lapsed. Doctors dealing oxycodone to anyone who can pay for it are directly fueling the opioid crisis, and the FBI will continue to investigate and bring to justice medical professionals involved in this dangerous drug diversion.”
“Prescribing deadly opioids without regard to the consequences simply cannot be tolerated,” said HHS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Dixon. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold accountable criminals who scheme to profit from prescribing medically unnecessary drugs.”
“This case is just one of many examples of federal law enforcement agencies working in close cooperation with each other to investigate and prosecute doctors who are prescribing and dispensing controlled substance medications without any legitimate medical purpose,” said DEA Special Agent in Charge Wilson.
In pleading guilty, Mintz admitted that, from about July 2016 through about July 2018, he worked at a medical practice in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He admitted that he sold eight fraudulent and medically unnecessary oxycodone prescriptions. Michael Young, charged elsewhere, purchased the 120 tablet 30 mg oxycodone prescriptions for $120 per person. Mintz wrote the prescriptions in the names of three individuals whom he had never met or examined.
This case was investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG, DEA and the U.S. Marshals Service. Trial Attorney Adam Yoffie of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section is prosecuting the case.
The Criminal Division’s Fraud Section leads the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, which is part of a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and HHS to focus their efforts to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country. Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, which maintains 14 strike forces operating in 23 districts, has charged nearly 4,000 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $14 billion.
Philadelphia-Area Doctor Pleads Guilty to Eight Counts of Unlawfully Distributing OxycodoneRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Richard Ira Mintz, D.O., 69, of Dresher, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty to eight counts of distributing controlled substances outside the scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.
From approximately July 2016 through July 2018, Mintz worked at a medical practice in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he sold fraudulent and medically unnecessary oxycodone prescriptions. Mintz wrote the prescriptions in the names of three individuals whom he had never met or examined.
This case originated as part of a regional Medicare Fraud Strike Force that operates in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the District of New Jersey. The Strike Force is a joint initiative between the Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Services to focus their efforts to prevent and deter fraud and enforce current anti-fraud laws around the country. Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, which maintains 14 strike forces operating in 23 districts, has charged nearly 4,000 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $14 billion.
“Richard Ira Mintz violated both his professional duty and the law by selling prescriptions for addictive opioids for individuals he never examined who had no medical need for the drugs,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski. “Halting the deadly scourge of opioids requires aggressively pursuing corrupt medical professionals who contribute to the opioid epidemic — and that is precisely why we created this regional Strike Force. I want to commend our prosecutors and all of our Strike Force partners for their ongoing work on this vital law enforcement priority.”
“Instead of adhering to his oath to ‘do no harm,’ this doctor chose to use his prescription pad to do just the opposite: with every stroke of the pen, he pushed dangerous opioids onto the streets and turned an illegal profit,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “As I stated at the launch of this new regional Strike Force partnership between the Department of Justice’s Criminal Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the District of New Jersey, combatting the opioid epidemic is a major priority of my Office. “Physicians who abuse their positions of trust within the community for financial gain will be held accountable by my Office.”
“Yet another long-time physician is caught illicitly pushing pills,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Philadephia Field Division. “Despite all that education and experience, at some point Richard Mintz’s priorities shifted and his ethics lapsed. Doctors dealing oxycodone to anyone who can pay for it are directly fueling the opioid crisis, and the FBI will continue to investigate and bring to justice medical professionals involved in this dangerous drug diversion.”
“Prescribing deadly opioids without regard to the consequences simply cannot be tolerated,” said Maureen Dixon, Regional Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services-Office of Inspector General. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to hold accountable criminals who scheme to profit from prescribing medically unnecessary drugs.”
“This case is just one of many examples of federal law enforcement agencies working in close cooperation with each other to investigate and prosecute doctors who are prescribing and dispensing controlled substance medications without any legitimate medical purpose,” said Jonathan Wilson, Special Agent in Charge for the Drug Enforcement Administration, Philadelphia Field Division.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Health and Human Services-Office of Inspector General, Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Marshals’ Service. Trial Attorney Adam Yoffie of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section is prosecuting the case.
Drug Trafficker Convicted at Trial for Distributing Crack Cocaine in North PhiladelphiaRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Juan Jarmon, 32 of Philadelphia, was convicted today of one count of conspiracy to distribute 280 grams or more of cocaine base (“crack”); one count of unlawful use of a communication facility in furtherance of a drug felony; five counts of distribution of cocaine base (“crack”); one count of aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine base (“crack”); five counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (“crack”); and 10 counts of distribution of and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (“crack”) within 1,000 feet of public housing.
The defendant was a leader of the Jarmon/Edwards drug-trafficking group (DTG) that sold crack cocaine in and around the Norman Blumberg Apartment Complex (Blumberg) in North Philadelphia from at least late 2012 through late 2014. Blumberg was a public housing facility that contained two children’s playgrounds. DTG members sold crack cocaine 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in and around the Blumberg high-rise buildings, which included the Hemberger Building and the Judson Building. The DTG employed a large network of supervisors, sellers, lookouts, suppliers, and those that permitted DTG members to use their apartments as stash locations and hideouts. During the course of the conspiracy, the group supplied over $1,000,000 of crack cocaine to this neighborhood.
From late 2012 until early-to-mid 2014, the defendant controlled drug sales in the Hemberger Building. Among other duties, the defendant purchased bulk crack and cocaine; cooked and packaged crack cocaine into bundles; sold crack cocaine to other drug traffickers and drug users; hired, fired, and supervised shift sellers and lookouts; secured apartment space and stash locations for their members; supplied bundles of crack cocaine to shift sellers; collected drug proceeds from shift sellers; levied taxes on members and customers; and provided protection to other drug trafficking groups. The defendant preyed on the financial weakness and vulnerability of others (including drug addicts, juveniles, the mentally ill, and those living in poverty) in order to further the interests of the DTG.
“Jarmon made money hand over fist selling crack for years, controlling his crew and capitalizing on other people’s addiction. Today’s verdict ensures that our streets are safer because Jarmon will remain where he belongs – behind bars – for years to come,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “I commend the hardworking prosecutors from my office and our law enforcement partners for putting this case together and holding this defendant accountable for the destruction he caused.”
“Juan Jarmon and his crew kept a tight, violent grip on the Blumberg Apartments complex and surrounding areas,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “Selling crack day and night, they made a nice profit, at the cost of the neighborhood’s quality of life. The FBI and our partners will continue to work to make this city safer by putting drug traffickers out of business and behind bars.”
“Juan Jarmon was convicted of leading a drug trafficking organization responsible for distributing crack cocaine in and around the former Norman Blumberg Apartment complex, which was one of the largest public housing projects in Philadelphia,” said Jonathan A. Wilson, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Philadelphia Field Division. “Jarmon and his associates sold the crack cocaine to street-level users, profiting from their addictions, and damaging the health and safety of the residents of the housing project. This case was a joint effort of the DEA, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Philadelphia Police Department.”
“The investigation, arrest, and successful prosecution of Juan Jarmon serve as an example of the effectiveness of strong and consistent collaboration between law enforcement agencies,” said Richard J. Ross, Jr., Philadelphia Police Commissioner. “We anticipate that this conviction will further disrupt narcotics trafficking and attendant criminal activity in and around the Norman Blumberg apartment complex, as well as the surrounding North Philadelphia neighborhood, and have an appreciable impact on the quality of life of our residents.”
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Philadelphia Police Department and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jerome Maiatico and Yvonne Osirim.
Tax Preparers Charged with Filing False ReturnsRead the Press Release
The owner and operator of First Premier Tax Service, a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, tax preparation business and a return preparer working at the business, were charged in connection with a scheme to prepare fraudulent tax returns in order to reduce taxes and inflate federal tax refunds for their clients, announced Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman and U.S. Attorney William McSwain for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
An indictment returned by a federal grand jury charged both Nvahbulai Quisiah and Gofin Kosia, also known as Kafumba Kromah, with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, three counts of wire fraud, and three counts of aggravated identity theft. Quisiah was also charged with eight counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of a false tax return. Kosia was charged with nine counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of a false tax return.
According to the indictment, Quisiah and Kosia prepared tax returns for clients for tax years 2009 through 2016 that fraudulently inflated itemized deductions, claimed fictitious Schedule C businesses, and claimed false dependents. As a result of these false items and deductions, the defendants allegedly inflated claimed tax refunds for their clients. The indictment alleges that the defendants knew their clients were not entitled to such refunds. One of the clients was an IRS agent acting in an undercover capacity. The indictment also alleges that the defendants bought and sold personal identifying information of children in order to falsely claim the children as dependents on tax returns for the defendants’ clients.
If convicted of aggravated identity theft, the defendants face a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison. Each count of wire fraud carries a maximum sentence of twenty years in prison, while each count of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns carries a maximum three year prison term. The defendants also face a period of supervised release, fines, and the payment of restitution.
An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case was investigated by Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Wzorek and Department of Justice Tax Division Attorney Ann M. Cherry.
U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Takes Part in Largest-Ever Nationwide Elder Fraud SweepRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – Attorney General William P. Barr and United States Attorney William M. McSwain today announced the largest coordinated sweep of elder fraud cases in history, surpassing last year’s nationwide sweep. The cases during this sweep involved more than 260 defendants from around the globe who victimized more than two million Americans, most of whom are elderly.
Two cases from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania are included in this nationwide sweep. In United States v. John Conner, the defendant was a lawyer who took advantage of his 85-year old client by using a power of attorney agreement to withdraw more than $95,000 from her bank account so he could gamble with her money at casinos. A jury convicted the attorney of 19 counts of wire fraud and one count of making a false statement to the FBI following a one-week trial in February 2019; he awaits sentencing. The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Mark Dubnoff.
The second case from this District is United States v. Jacoya Brazzle. There, the defendant was a nursing assistant at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (“VAMC”) in Coatesville, Pennsylvania. She allegedly obtained the ATM PIN of a veteran who resides in the assisted living unit at the VAMC, went to ATMs near the VAMC on more than a dozen occasions over the course of six months, and withdrew over $11,000. The trial is scheduled for later this spring. The case was investigated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Nancy Rue.
“Crimes against the elderly target some of the most vulnerable people in our society,” Attorney General William P. Barr said. “But thanks to the hard work of our agents and prosecutors, as well as our state and local partners, the Department of Justice is protecting our seniors from fraud. The Trump administration has placed a renewed focus on prosecuting those who prey on the elderly, and the results of today’s sweep make that clear. Today, we are announcing the largest single law enforcement action against elder fraud in American history. This year’s sweep involves 13 percent more criminal defendants, 28 percent more in losses, and twice the number of fraud victims as last year’s sweep. I want to thank the Department’s Consumer Protection Branch, which led this effort, together with the Department’s Criminal Division, the more than 50 U.S. Attorneys’ offices, and the state and local partners who helped to make these results possible. Together, we are bringing justice and peace of mind to America's seniors.”
“Our Office will continue to prioritize prosecuting criminals who prey on our elderly residents,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “I would like to thank Attorney General Barr for his leadership in this initiative; AUSAs Mark Dubnoff and Nancy Rue for their work on the Conner and Brazzle prosecutions; and AUSA Tiwana Wright for her work overseeing the elder abuse cases for our Office.”
The Department took action in every federal district across the country by filing criminal or civil cases or by engaging in consumer education efforts. In each case, offenders allegedly engaged in financial schemes that targeted or largely affected seniors. In total, the charged elder fraud schemes caused alleged losses of millions of more dollars than last year, putting the total alleged losses at this year’s sweep at over three quarters of a billion dollars.
The charges in the Brazzle case are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Since President Trump signed the bipartisan Elder Abuse Prevention and Prosecution Act (“EAPPA”) into law, the Department of Justice has participated in hundreds of enforcement actions in criminal and civil cases that have protected seniors. The Justice Department has also conducted hundreds of trainings and outreach sessions across the country since the passage of the Act.
Tax Preparers Indicted for Identify Theft, Wire Fraud, and Filing False ReturnsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain, along with Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman, announced today that the owner and operator of a Philadelphia-based tax preparation business and his employee were charged with preparing fraudulent tax returns and related crimes in order to reduce taxes and inflate federal tax refunds for their clients.
Nvahbulai Quisiah, 43, of Philadelphia, and Gofin Kosia, 43, of Philadelphia, were charged by federal indictment with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, 17 counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation and filing of a false tax return, 6 counts of wire fraud, and 6 counts of aggravated identity theft. Quisiah is the owner of First Premier Tax Service, a tax preparation business, and Kosia is a tax preparer employed there.
According to the indictment, Quisiah and Kosia prepared tax returns for clients for tax years 2009 through 2016 that fraudulently inflated itemized deductions, claimed fictitious Schedule C businesses, and claimed false dependents. As a result of these false items and deductions, the defendants allegedly inflated claimed tax refunds for their clients. The indictment alleges that the defendants knew their clients were not entitled to such refunds. One of the clients was an IRS agent acting in an undercover capacity. The indictment also alleges that the defendants bought and sold personal identifying information of children in order to falsely claim the children as dependents on tax returns for the defendants’ clients.
If convicted of aggravated identity theft, the defendants face a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison. Each count of wire fraud carries a maximum sentence of twenty years in prison, while each count of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns carries a maximum three year prison term. The defendants also face a period of supervised release, fines, and the payment of restitution.
“Tax preparers are supposed to follow and apply our tax laws to assist clients to accurately report their income and pay their fair share of federal taxes, not bend or ignore the rules to suit their client’s needs,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “As alleged, the defendants enriched themselves and their clients at the expense of taxpayers who take seriously their legal obligation to file complete and accurate federal income taxes each year. My Office will continue to aggressively prosecute these kinds of cases.”
An indictment alleges that crimes have been committed. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case was investigated by Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Wzorek and Department of Justice Tax Division Attorney Ann M. Cherry.
Delaware County Attorney Charged with FraudRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Daniel Vermeychuk, 66, of Wallingford, Pennsylvania, was charged in an indictment unsealed today with four counts of wire fraud, one count of social security fraud, and one count of theft from an employee benefit fund.
According to the indictment, the defendant obtained Social Security and pension benefit funds intended for the deceased tenant of an apartment building owned by the defendant’s wife. After the tenant’s death, the defendant continued to withdraw the benefit funds and used the money for his own purposes. According to public records, the defendant is an attorney licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.
If convicted, the defendant faces a maximum possible sentence of 90 years imprisonment, full restitution, a fine, and a period of supervised release.
“Daniel Vermeychuk is charged with conduct that, if proven at trial, stands in stark contrast to the oath he swore as an attorney – to uphold the rule of law,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Instead of entering a courtroom to represent clients before the court, his next appearances will be to answer to these charges, and if found guilty, to be held accountable for them.”
The case was investigated by the Social Security Administration’s Office of Inspector General, the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General, and the United States Postal Inspection Service. The case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Christopher E. Parisi.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
U.S. Attorney’s Office Reaches $260,000 Civil Settlement with HNTB, Inc.Read the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA - United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that the United States reached a $260,000 civil settlement with HNTB, Inc. concerning HNTB's alleged improper billing under a contract to provide catenary services (i.e., overhead electrical wires) with Amtrak.
HNTB provided services as part of the New Jersey High Speed Rail Improvement Program under Amtrak Architectural & Engineering Services Contract. The Contract required that HNTB bill actual labor and overhead rates for the employees working on this project. The United States contends that it has certain civil claims against HNTB arising from HNTB's billing under the Contract during the period December 5, 2012 through July 28, 2017. This conduct included HNTB overbilling Amtrak by not adjusting its overhead rates in subsequent contract years to match actual overhead rates. Instead, HNTB continued to bill overhead at a maximum rate listed in the Contract.
“Our Office is dedicated to helping Amtrak and our other federal partners maintain the integrity of their contracts,” said U. S. Attorney McSwain. “The excellent work of the Amtrak Office of Inspector General laid the groundwork for a fair and speedy resolution of this matter and reinforces the duty of contractors to ensure compliance with the terms of their federal contracts.”
“We remain committed to investigating any case where there are credible indicators of a contractor overbilling Amtrak,” said Tom Howard, Amtrak Inspector General. “This settlement is indicative of that commitment and was the result of hard work by dedicated staff coupled with seamless collaboration with the U.S. Attorney's Office.”
Amtrak's Office of Inspector General initiated an investigation after discovering discrepancies in HNTB's billing during a review of select Amtrak contracts. Assistant United States Attorney Colin Cherico and Auditor Dawn Wiggins supported the OIG's investigation and handled the settlement for the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The claims settled by this settlement agreement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.
Philadelphia Business Man Sentenced to Prison for Honest Services Fraud, Tax Crimes, and ConspiracyRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that James Davis, the former vendor who operated Sheriff sales for the Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office, was sentenced today to 121 months’ imprisonment, and ordered to pay $872,395.00 in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service and $1.718,540.00 in forfeiture. The sentence was imposed by United States District Judge Wendy Beetlestone.
In April 2018, after a six-week trial, a federal jury convicted Davis of conspiracy, honest services wire fraud, filing false federal tax returns for 2007, and willful failure to file federal tax returns for 2008, 2009, and 2010. The conspiracy and honest services fraud counts charged Davis with defrauding the citizens of Philadelphia of the honest services of the Sheriff of Philadelphia, John Green, from 2002 to 2011, by giving Green a hidden stream of personal benefits in exchange for Davis and his companies maintaining and receiving increased business and fees from the Sheriff’s Office.
The indictment charged Davis with (1) purchasing, renovating and selling a home to Green at a loss to Davis in 2002 and 2003, which was not reported on Green’s financial disclosure forms; (2) hiring and paying Green’s wife over $89,000 as a subcontractor from 2004 through 2010, which was not reported to the City; (3) facilitating over $65,000 in hidden campaign contributions to Green’s 2007 reelection campaign, which was not reported in Green’s campaign reports; (4) paying $148,000 in advertising for Green’s 2007 reelection campaign, which was not reported in Green’s campaign reports; and (5) giving Green, in 2010, $320,000 as gifts and interest-free loans to help Green purchase a retirement home in Florida. In exchange, Green helped Davis maintain and increase his business with the Sheriff’s Office.
“The citizens of Philadelphia are entitled to the honest services of their public servants, and James Davis’s actions deprived them of that from the Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Davis received millions of dollars of business from the Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office, having obtained nearly exclusive control over the operation of the Sheriff sales and receiving over $7 million in advertising fees for those sales. The sentence imposed today sends a powerful message to public servants and vendors who choose to do business by their own set of rules.”
“There's an old saying that you have to spend money to make money,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. “Certainly, this is not the way to do it. James Davis brazenly bribed then-Sheriff Green in order to boost his businesses. This illicit quid pro quo deprived Philadelphians of the honest services they expect and deserve from those who hold elected office. The FBI is committed to fighting such corruption, which does real and lasting damage to the public trust.”
“James Davis willfully and intentionally violated his legal duty to file his tax returns and pay the correct amount of tax,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Guy Ficco. "The courts have overwhelmingly and consistently shown that people who engage in such criminal behavior will be held accountable; as evidenced by the sentence handed down today.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, and Office of Inspector General, City of Philadelphia, and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Sarah L. Grieb and Christopher Diviny and Department of Justice Trial Attorney Jennifer A. Clarke.
Philadelphia Business Man Sentenced to More Than 10 Years in Prison for Bribing the Former Sheriff of PhiladelphiaRead the Press Release
A Wyncote, Pennsylvania man was sentenced to 121 months in prison for participating in a bribery conspiracy involving the former Sheriff of Philadelphia.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Special Agent in Charge Michael T. Harpster of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division and Special Agent in Charge Guy Ficco of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Philadelphia Field Office made the announcement.
James Davis, 68, the owner of multiple advertising and title firms, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who also ordered Davis to pay $ 872,395.83 in restitution and to forfeit $1,718,540. On April 3, 2018, after a six-week jury trial, Davis was convicted of conspiracy, honest services fraud, and tax offenses.
“James Davis used his wealth to line the pockets of the former Sheriff of Philadelphia in a corrupt exchange for contracts and business,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski. “Today’s sentence should deter both public officials and would-be bribe payers from engaging in corruption of any kind.”
“The citizens of Philadelphia are entitled to the honest services of their public servants, and James Davis’s actions deprived them of that from the Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Davis received millions of dollars of business from the Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office, having obtained nearly exclusive control over the operation of the Sheriff sales and receiving over $7 million in advertising fees for those sales. The sentence imposed today sends a powerful message to public servants and vendors who choose to do business by their own set of rules.”
“There’s an old saying that you have to spend money to make money,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Harpster. “Certainly, this is not the way to do it. James Davis brazenly bought off then-Sheriff Green in order to boost his businesses. This illicit quid pro quo deprived Philadelphians of the honest services they expect and deserve from those who hold elected office. The FBI is committed to fighting such corruption, which does real and lasting damage to the public trust.”
“James Davis willfully and intentionally violated his legal duty to file his tax returns and pay the correct amount of tax,” said IRS-CI Special Agent in Charge Ficco. “The courts have overwhelmingly and consistently shown that people who engage in such criminal behavior will be held accountable; as evidenced by the sentence handed down today.”
According to the evidence presented at trial, Davis, in exchange for receiving, maintaining and increasing business with the Sheriff’s office, gave former Sheriff John Green bribes and personal benefits totaling over $675,000, including purchasing and renovating a home and selling the home at a loss to Green, hiring Green’s wife as a sub-contractor, facilitating over $65,000 in hidden campaign contributions to Green’s 2007 re-election campaign, paying $148,000 in campaign advertising for Green’s 2007 re-election campaign, and paying Green over $300,000 in gifts and interest-free loans. In exchange, the evidence presented at trial showed that Green helped Davis maintain and increase his business with the Sheriff’s Office, specifically, business involving sheriff’s sales of foreclosed property. From approximately 2002 through 2010, Davis’ companies received over $35 million from the Philadelphia Sheriff’s office from the sheriff’s sales business.
Additionally, the evidence presented at trial revealed that Davis also filed false 2007 business and personal tax returns, and failed to file personal tax returns for 2008, 2009, and 2010.
The FBI and IRS-CI investigated this case. Trial Attorney Jennifer A. Clarke of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sarah L. Grieb and Christopher Diviny of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania are prosecuting the case.
U.S. Attorney’s Office Brings Federal Charges After the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office Agrees to a Lenient Plea Deal in a Violent RobberyRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – On February 28, 2019, United States Attorney William M. McSwain convened a press conference to announce charges against Jovaun Patterson of Philadelphia, who is alleged to have shot Philadelphia shop owner, Li (“Mike”) Poeng, with an assault rifle during an attempted robbery of Mr. Poeng’s convenience store on May 5, 2018. Mr. Poeng is a refugee from Cambodia who became a U.S. citizen in 1998. As a result of the shooting, Mr. Poeng is confined to a wheelchair. The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office originally charged Patterson with multiple crimes, including attempted murder and aggravated assault, but then dropped the attempted murder charges and agreed to a lenient plea deal of 3 ½ to 10 years imprisonment. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has now stepped in to bring federal charges.
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery
Good afternoon, everybody. I am here today to announce criminal charges against Jovaun Patterson of Philadelphia, who is alleged to have shot Philadelphia shop owner, Mike Poeng, with a military-style assault rifle on May 5, 2018, during an attempted robbery of Mr. Poeng’s convenience store located at 300 South 54th Street. Mr. Poeng is a refugee from Cambodia who became a U.S. citizen in 1998, and is a married father of three young sons. As a result of the shooting, Mr. Poeng had his right leg nearly blown off and is presently confined to a wheelchair. Earlier today, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against Patterson, charging him with (a) one count of attempted robbery which interferes with interstate commerce and (b) one count of using, carrying and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. On the gun charge alone, he faces a statutory maximum of life imprisonment and a statutory minimum of 10 years’ imprisonment, which must run consecutively to any other sentence imposed on the attempted robbery count.
I want to thank the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which investigated this case, and in particular, Acting Special Agent in Charge Brian Gallagher, Supervisory Special Agent John Bowman and Special Agent David Krueger, all of whom are with us today. I want to thank the Philadelphia Police Department for its assistance in our investigation. Thank you to Sal Astolfi, the Chief of the Violent Crime unit in my Office, who is prosecuting the case. Thank you to Tom Malone, who is representing Mr. Poeng pro bono and helping him to navigate through the legal system. And thank you, Mr. Poeng, for being here today.
Mr. Poeng’s story, and the circumstances surrounding this case, which was originally charged by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, are well known and have been the subject of much public discussion and, understandably, much outrage. After a struggle with an armed assailant in front of his store – all captured on videotape – Mr. Poeng was shot and rendered unconscious. His wife, who had been inside the store with the couple’s three sons, raced from the store and found her husband face down on the sidewalk, bleeding profusely. He was rushed to the hospital, where he went into cardiac arrest and remained in a coma for weeks. Following a long hospital stay and a period in a rehabilitation facility, he returned home in August 2018. Mr. Poeng is now confined to a wheelchair and does not know if he will ever walk again on his own.
In July 2018, Jovaun Patterson was arrested by the Philadelphia police. He was charged with attempted murder, aggravated assault, robbery–threat of immediate serious injury, possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, possession of a firearm on a street in Philadelphia, possession of an instrument of crime, simple assault and recklessly endangering another person. After a two-minute hearing in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, the District Attorney’s Office dropped the attempted murder charge, both gun charges, the simple assault charge and the recklessly endangering charge, and Patterson was sentenced to 3 ½ to 10 years imprisonment as part of a plea deal that was negotiated by the District Attorney’s Office. In violation of the Pennsylvania Crime Victims Act, the District Attorney’s Office told Mike Poeng nothing of the deal.
When the public learned of this deal and criticism of it mounted, a spokesman for the District Attorney’s Office defended it – saying that withdrawal of the attempted murder charge was “wholly appropriate as the video evidence depicted a struggle involving the gun prior to its discharge.” I have carefully considered that statement and I still do not understand it. I guess it’s supposed to mean that because Mike Poeng decided to fight for his life and to protect his wife and children, the person who shot him somehow deserves a break. As for the sentence imposed, the District Attorney’s Office spokesman went on to state that it, too, was “wholly appropriate.”
When public criticism of the sentence continued, the District Attorney’s Office tried a different approach. This time, the Office blamed the assistant district attorney working on the case. The District Attorney’s Office spokesman claimed that “the assigned ADA made two mistakes. First, she did not contact the victim prior to the plea . . . and second, she did not get authorization from her supervisor to convey the plea offer.”
What does that explanation tell us? It tells us that nobody in leadership at the District Attorney’s Office even knows what’s going on in plea negotiations or in the courtroom in significant violent crime matters. In the absence of supervision, however, the assistant district attorneys certainly know that they are to pursue deals that will please the District Attorney or they risk losing their jobs, and there is no doubt that the assistant district attorney in the Patterson case did exactly that – offering a lenient 3 ½ to 10 year deal because she thought that reflected the new priorities of the District Attorney’s Office.
Whether this plea deal was approved in advance or not, nobody in leadership at the District Attorney’s Office should be blaming the assistant district attorney. The first principle of running a prosecutor’s office – or any office, for that matter – is that the leader of the office is responsible for everything that the office does or fails to do. Running a large prosecutor’s office comes with public scrutiny and can come with public criticism. Leaders take personal responsibility. They don’t blame the people who work for them.
Mike Poeng deserves justice. The “new” District Attorney’s Office was not able to provide it to him. He will now have his chance to be heard in federal court.
And what has the “new” District Attorney’s Office meant for Philadelphia more broadly? Potential criminals on the streets of our City are not stupid. They pay attention to what is happening at the District Attorney’s Office. When the District Attorney begins his tenure by summarily firing the Office’s most experienced prosecutors (and casually maligning them as they exited the building), when the Office is woefully understaffed, when the new hires at the Office share their boss’ anti-law enforcement philosophy, when the Philadelphia Police Department absorbs constant unfair criticism from the Office, when the Office routinely violates state law by not communicating with victims of violent crime, when the Office consistently undercharges violent crime cases, when it offers sweetheart deals to violent defendants, when its overall stated priority is “decarceration,” when it leads the charge for lenient bail conditions, when the Office issues a memorandum of “new policies” that reads like something written by a radical defense attorney, and when the District Attorney refers to himself as a “public defender with power” – violent criminals take notice of all of that. And they become emboldened. They think they can literally get away with murder.
Sadly, there are likely to be terrible consequences for public safety in Philadelphia as a result of all of this. The only way to effectively deter homicide and other violent crime is to put fear into the hearts of those who would commit such crimes – fear of the law enforcement consequences. The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office isn’t putting fear into the hearts of anybody who is contemplating a life of violent crime. Instead, what’s even worse, is that the District Attorney’s Office is putting fear into the hearts of law-abiding citizens who have to deal with the terror of homicide and other violent crime in their neighborhoods.
Unfortunately, we are seeing the results already. In 2018, the District Attorney’s first year in office, Philadelphia endured 351 homicides, the most in over a decade, and an 11% increase as compared to 2017. There were 1,365 shooting victims in the City in 2018, the most since 2011, also an 11% increase as compared to 2017. Thus far in 2019, this alarming pattern has continued, as there were more homicides in January 2019 than there were in January 2018. Just last week, an 18-year old was fatally shot in North Philadelphia, the third teenager to be killed by gunfire in the City in a week. The chart to my left depicts the number of homicides in the City on a yearly basis from 2013 to 2018. [Display the chart].
These 2018 Philadelphia homicide numbers have occurred against the backdrop of a sharp decline in homicides nationwide. According to preliminary reports, in 2018, homicides were down approximately 7% nationwide in cities with more than one million residents. Nearby, Chester, PA saw a 38% decrease in homicides in 2018; both Camden, NJ and Newark, NJ also experienced a decrease. It is not a coincidence that Philadelphia saw a double-digit percentage increase in homicides in 2018, while our nearby cities, and the nation as a whole, experienced a significant decrease. The policies of the District Attorney’s Office are undoubtedly playing a large role in this tragedy – and nobody should be surprised by it. I’m not.
And who is it that is dying as a result of this homicide epidemic? By and large, it’s African-Americans, as well as Latinos. In 2018, 276 of the 351 homicide victims were African-Americans, or 79%, while 44 of the 351 were Hispanic, or 13%. Thus, a staggering 92% of the homicide victims in Philadelphia in 2018 were African-American or Hispanic. The chart to my left depicts the number of homicides in the City on a yearly basis from 2013 to 2018, broken down by the race of the victim. [Display the chart]. This chart tells a most unfortunate story. And it’s one that the District Attorney’s Office should be working hard to fix – not, as it is doing with its current policies, making worse.
The policies of the District Attorney’s Office are harming minority communities all across the City. And the people who have the right to be the most outraged by these policies are those in the African-American community and the Latino community. Everyone in the City – and I mean everyone – deserves to live in a safe neighborhood.
The District Attorney calls himself “a public defender with power.” That is not his job. He’s not supposed to be a public defender, advocating for defendants. He’s supposed to be a prosecutor, advocating for victims and protecting the community. I can assure you this: the prosecutors of my Office, working with our federal and state law enforcement partners, as well as with the Philadelphia police, will do everything in our power to keep the City safe.
Thank you, and at this time, I am happy to take your questions.
Federal Attempted Robbery and Firearms Charges Filed after Philadelphia Man Received Lenient Plea Deal from the Philadelphia District Attorney’s OfficeRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Jovaun Patterson, 30, of Philadelphia. The indictment charges him with one count of attempted robbery which interferes with interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and one count of using, carrying, and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). These charges stem from an alleged robbery on May 5, 2018, of the KCJ, Inc. convenience store, a business engaged in interstate commerce and located in Philadelphia.
If convicted of the attempted robbery, the defendant faces a maximum penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment; a $250,000 fine; 3 years’ supervised release; and a $100 special assessment. If convicted of the firearms charge, the defendant faces a maximum penalty of lifetime imprisonment, a mandatory term of 10 years’ imprisonment, to be served consecutive to any other sentence imposed; up to 5 years’ supervised release; a $250,000 fine; and a $100 special assessment.
Prior to today’s federal indictment, Patterson was arrested for the May 5, 2018 incident and charged by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office with attempted murder, aggravated assault, robbery–threat of immediate serious injury, possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, possession of a firearm on a street in Philadelphia, possessing an instrument of crime, simple assault, and recklessly endangering another person. On November 15, 2018, the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office permitted Patterson to enter a negotiated guilty plea to aggravated assault, robbery–threat of immediate serious injury, and possessing an instrument of crime, with a sentence of only 3½ to 10 years’ imprisonment.
“Violent crime is a top priority of the Department of Justice and my Office,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Prosecutors are supposed to advocate for victims, protect the community, and always seek justice. I can assure the citizens of Philadelphia that the prosecutors in my Office, working with our federal and state law enforcement partners, as well as with the Philadelphia police, will do everything in our power to do that in each and every case, including this one.”
“ATF remains committed to removing violent offenders from our community,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Brian Gallagher. “We look forward to continuing to work with our partners at all levels to make our citizens safer.”
This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. October 3, 2018, marked one year since the Department of Justice reinvigorated PSN as part of its renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, locally-based strategies to reduce violent crime.
This case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, with assistance from the Philadelphia Police Department and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Salvatore Astolfi.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Philadelphia Man Convicted of Multiple Offenses at Trial Including Bribery and Aggravated Identity TheftRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Bakary Camara, 32, of Philadelphia, was convicted today by a jury of one count of conspiracy to produce identification documents without lawful authority, one count of bribery of an agent from PennDOT, two counts of misuse of a Social Security number, and one count of aggravated identity theft.
The defendant bribed his co-conspirator Henry Gibbs (a former PennDOT agent) in order to unlawfully obtain Pennsylvania learner’s permits and non-commercial and commercial driver’s licenses for foreign nationals and others. Some of the individuals for whom the defendant assisted in getting a driver’s license did not speak English and could not pass the DMV knowledge tests. The defendant obtained and attempted to obtain licenses for at least one individual who entered the country illegally. In return for the bribes, Gibbs entered false information into the PennDOT system indicating the individuals passed the required tests, even though they had never taken them.
Moreover, the defendant falsified documents (including utility bills, cellular phone bills, tax notices, and insurance documents) to make it appear that some non-Pennsylvania residents lived in Pennsylvania. The defendant gave the individuals the falsified documents to provide to Gibbs, who accepted the falsified documents and uploaded them into the PennDOT system. The defendant unlawfully assisted at least 30 immigrants and foreign nationals in obtaining Pennsylvania learner’s permits and driver’s licenses through Gibbs. The defendant charged these individuals $300 to $7,000 to assist them with obtaining a Pennsylvania driver’s license and provided Gibbs at least $5,000 in bribes.
“This kind of bribery and fraud will never be tolerated,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “It is incredibly dangerous to provide driver’s licenses to those who have not even passed a driving test. In his scheme, the defendant committed a fraud on the government and created a true danger to public safety. We are grateful that the jury held him accountable for his crimes.”
“Today’s guilty verdict highlights Homeland Security Investigations Philadelphia continued vigilance against corruption schemes that damage the trust the public places in our state institutions,” said Marlon V. Miller, Special Agent in Charge of HSI Philadelphia. “This case is another excellent example of federal, state and local cooperation to combat fraud in our community.”
The case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations and the Social Security Administration, with special assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Tiwana Wright.
Defendant Who Raped a Child Because of Philadelphia’s Sanctuary City Policies Is Sentenced to Prison for Illegal ReentryRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Juan Ramon-Vasquez, a citizen of Honduras, was sentenced today to 21 months’ imprisonment, to be served consecutive to his state sentence, for his federal crime of illegal reentry to the United States after deportation. The federal sentence was imposed by United States District Judge Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro. In May 2009, Ramon-Vasquez was deported from the United States to Honduras. In March 2014, he was found back in the United States by U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) officers. At that time, Ramon-Vasquez was in the custody of the Philadelphia Department of Prisons.
The City of Philadelphia thereafter chose not to comply with a detainer lodged by ICE for Ramon-Vasquez, who was instead released from custody by the Philadelphia Department of Prisons. After his release, Ramon-Vasquez proceeded to repeatedly rape a young child. The defendant is currently serving a sentence of 8 to 20 years in state prison for the rapes.
“The facts of this case illustrate all too well the direct threat to public safety caused by the City of Philadelphia’s sanctuary city policies,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “After the City let this criminal loose on the streets of Philadelphia, Ramon-Vasquez repeatedly raped an innocent child. If the ICE detainer had been honored by local law enforcement, this crime never would have happened, and the victim would have been spared horrendous physical and mental trauma. Criminals like Ramon-Vasquez take note: my Office will do everything in its power to find you, to protect our community, and to seek justice for your victims. Unlike the Philadelphia government, we are not on your side.”
“ICE attempted to remove Ramon-Vasquez once before in March 2014, but the City of Philadelphia refused to honor our detainer and he was released back into the community, said Simona L. Flores, field office director for ERO Philadelphia. “Today’s sentencing is a testament to ICE and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s resolve to seek out, arrest, charge and remove dangerous criminals like Ramon-Vasquez who pose a serious threat to our community.”
The case was investigated by ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Josh Davison.
Dynamic Therapy Services, LLC and PhysioHealth, Inc. to Pay $2 Million to Resolve Allegations of Improperly Billing TRICARE for Services Provided by Non-Authorized ProvidersRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that PhysioHealth Inc. and its wholly owned company Dynamic Therapy Services, LLC have agreed to pay $2 million to resolve allegations that it billed TRICARE for unallowable physical therapy services provided by non-authorized providers, including physical therapy assistants at clinics in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Maryland.
The government launched an investigation after Dynamic Therapy voluntarily disclosed to the United States that between January 12, 2011, and January 23, 2017, Dynamic Therapy had provided professional services to TRICARE beneficiaries using physical therapy assistants, and then billed the services under the supervising physical therapist’s provider number. At the time the services were rendered, TRICARE did not cover physical therapy services rendered by physical therapy assistants, since they were not considered authorized providers under TRICARE rules then in effect.
“Physical therapy providers have a responsibility to ensure that they are complying with billing regulations,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Dynamic Therapy and PhysioHealth discovered non-compliance problems internally. To their credit, they took corrective action to ensure that TRICARE beneficiaries are provided with services from authorized providers, and they came forward to voluntarily disclose to the Government what had occurred. Their proactive approach in this case sets a good example for other providers who might find themselves facing similar issues.”
“Ensuring the integrity of TRICARE, the Defense Department’s health care program, is a top priority for the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS),” stated Special Agent-in-Charge Leigh-Alistair Barzey, DCIS Northeast Field Office. “DCIS will continue to work with the United States Attorney’s Office and other law enforcement partners to protect TRICARE and the uniformed service members, retirees, and their families who rely upon it.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Judith Amorosa and Auditor Dawn Wiggins handled the case for the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The matter was investigated by the Defense Criminal Investigative Services. The voluntary disclosure was made to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services which assisted in the resolution of this matter.
Philadelphia Businessman Ordered to Pay $81,217 in Restitution for Failure to Pay Employment TaxesRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Jong Young Choi, 46, of Chalfont, PA, was ordered to pay $81,217.00 in restitution for willful failure to pay employment taxes. He was also sentenced to 5 years' probation for his conduct. Choi, as the president and sole shareholder of JUNS, Inc., doing business as Daisy Dry Cleaners, located in Philadelphia, was responsible for collecting, accounting for, and paying employment taxes due to the Internal Revenue Service from January 1, 2012 through January 31, 2016. He failed to collect and pay approximately $67,931 in employment taxes for his employees.
“By ignoring his employment tax obligations for years, Choi lived by his own set of self-imposed rules, but his criminal conduct eventually caught up with him,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Failure to pay employment taxes is a federal crime – one that my Office takes seriously. We will continue to hold people accountable when they willfully fail to pay taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service.”
“When Jong Choi made the decision not to collect and turn over all IRS withholding taxes, he also made the decision to cheat his employees and other honest taxpayers,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Guy Ficco. "The investigation of employment tax fraud is a priority for the special agents of IRS-CI as our system of taxation depends on everybody paying their fair share. Let today’s sentence serve as a warning to those contemplating similar actions."
The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Terri A. Marinari.
Lehigh Valley Technologies, Inc. to Pay $4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Liability for Scheme to Avoid FDA New Drug Application FeeRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Lehigh Valley Technologies, Inc. (“LVT”) agreed to a $4 million settlement of allegations under the False Claims Act that it designed a scheme to avoid paying fees associated with new drug applications to the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). LVT is a pharmaceutical company engaged in the development and commercialization of certain human drug products that is located in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
The FDA regulates the approval of new drugs. A company seeking such approval must submit and receive FDA approval of a new drug application (“NDA”) before the drug may be marketed or sold in the United States. The NDA application is the vehicle through which drug sponsors formally propose that the FDA approve a new drug for sale and marketing.
Congress created the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) in 1992 that authorizes and requires the FDA to collect a “prescription drug user fee” or “application fee” from companies that submit an NDA. PDUFA gives the FDA a revenue source to fund the new drug approval process.
Under 21 U.S.C. § 379h(d)(1)(C), the FDA will grant a waiver of the fee to a small business applicant submitting its first application. In making that determination, the FDA must consider “any affiliate of the applicant,” including large businesses or businesses that have already received the fee waiver. One significant purpose of the fee waiver is to incentivize and level the playing field for small businesses that submit an NDA. Limiting the waiver to first-time applicants allows a new, small business to enter the industry without the significant costs to entry that the NDA fee would otherwise impose.
Here, LVT had previously received a fee waiver in 2010 for its Oxycodone Hydrochloride NDA. Because it received that fee waiver, LVT was ineligible to receive another such fee waiver. LVT subsequently desired to submit two NDAs relating to potassium chloride for oral solution. Had LVT submitted the NDAs in its own name, the FDA would have required it to pay fees totaling over $2 million.
Knowing that it was ineligible, LVT allegedly developed a scheme with two companies to avoid the fees. Under the terms of the agreements, LVT paid the companies to submit NDAs for potassium chloride for oral solution in their own name. LVT’s payment to the companies was contingent upon the FDA granting waivers from the prescription drug user fee. LVT prepared and controlled all of the submissions that the companies made to the FDA relating to the NDA approval. Neither LVT nor the companies disclosed to the government the agreements despite the government’s request for such information. Not knowing of the agreements, the FDA granted fee waivers and approved both NDAs.
“As alleged, the sole purpose of the arrangement was for those companies to serve as a front and allow LVT to avoid the FDA fees that the FDA otherwise would have required it to pay,” said U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain. “The arrangement was illegal. Like we did today, we will hold companies accountable that scheme to avoid the fees that enable the FDA to carry out its vitally important drug approval process.”
“The FDA laws and accompanying regulations for funding drug approvals are designed, in part, to encourage companies, even small businesses, to create new drugs,” said Mark S. McCormack, Special Agent in Charge, FDA Office of Criminal Investigations’ Metro Washington Field Office. “When companies attempt to game the system to avoid paying these critical fees, we will bring them to justice.”
This case was investigated by FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations. For the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the investigation and settlement were handled by Civil Chief Gregory B. David, Auditor Denis Cooke, and former extern Bianca A. Valcarce.
Two Individuals Charged with Attempted Robbery of Smithgall’s Pharmacy in Lancaster, PARead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Brandon Galette, 24, of Harrisburg, PA, and Andrew Garrett, 24, of Steelton, PA, were charged today by Indictment with one count of attempted robbery which interferes with interstate commerce and one count of using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. Galette is also charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The Indictment charges Galette and Garrett for their alleged participation in the October 23, 2018 attempted robbery of Smithgall’s Pharmacy in Lancaster, PA, during which they allegedly attempted to steal prescription opioids.
If convicted, the defendants each face a maximum penalty of lifetime imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of seven years in prison, to be served consecutive to any other sentence imposed, plus five years of supervised release. Additionally, Galette faces a $750,000 fine and a $300 special assessment, while Garrett faces a $500,000 fine and a $200 special assessment.
“Stemming the tide of violent crime in our communities is a top priority of the Department of Justice and my Office,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “People looking to make a quick buck by robbing convenience stores, pharmacies, and other businesses beware: this conduct is a federal crime, and if you are convicted, you will face stiff penalties under federal law.”
The case is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police, and it is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Timothy M. Stengel.
An Indictment is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Five Assistant United States Attorneys Honored for Their Work in Significant Criminal and Civil Cases in the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that five members of this Office will be honored for their exemplary service in cases that have had a profound impact on the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Assistant United States Attorneys Margaret Hutchinson, Nelson S.T. Thayer, and Linwood C. Wright each were selected for a Director’s Award from the Executive Office of the United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”). Assistant United States Attorneys Veronica Finkelstein and Charlene Keller Fullmer were selected for the Cooperative Achievement Award from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General.
“This talented group of public servants – comprised of AUSAs from our Civil and Criminal Divisions – exemplifies the depth and breadth of talent we have in this Office. The contributions they have made reflect the hard work, dedication, and sacrifice it takes to serve so honorably in the law enforcement profession. I am incredibly proud to serve with them every day,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.
EOUSA Director’s Awards
EOUSA Director’s Awards recognize employees of the United States Attorneys’ offices (USAOs) and EOUSA, as well as other individuals, who have supported the mission of these offices and who have distinguished themselves through extraordinary professional achievements and excellence. The awards ceremony will take place in Washington, DC, later this year. EOUSA provides oversight, general executive assistance, and direction to the 94 United States Attorneys’ offices around the country. For more information on EOUSA and its mission, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao.
AUSAs Nelson Thayer and Linwood C. (“LC”) Wright. Thayer and Wright have been named as recipients of the EOUSA Director’s Award for Superior Performance by a Litigative Team, for their successful prosecution in United States v. Mohammed Jabbateh. They are receiving this award alongside colleagues from the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Embassy in Liberia.
While a commander of one of the warring factions during Liberia’s first civil war, Jabbateh committed acts of the deepest depravity, including sexual assault and enslavement, murder, mutilation, and ritual cannibalism. As a result of the dedication and tireless efforts of Thayer, Wright, and their team, Jabbateh was convicted in October 2017 following a two-week jury trial on charges of immigration fraud and perjury, based on his multiple lies to U.S. immigration officials in which he concealed his horrendous wartime conduct. In April 2018, Jabbateh was sentenced to the maximum possible sentence of 30 years’ imprisonment, the most severe sentence ever imposed in such a case. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/former-liberian-war-lord-known-jungle-jabbah-sentenced-30-years-prison-immigration.
Former AUSA and Civil Division Chief Margaret “Peg” Hutchinson. Hutchinson will be awarded the EOUSA Director’s first-ever Lifetime Exceptional Service Award. She is being recognized for her exceptional contributions to the USAO community over her nearly thirty years as a civil AUSA, including as the Civil Division Chief and as the leader of the national Civil Chiefs Working Group. Hutchinson led impactful affirmative civil enforcement litigation against hospitals, pharmaceutical and device companies, elder care providers, polluters, and others in areas that were or would become DOJ priorities. She also made significant, enduring contributions to DOJ’s efforts to implement programs, develop and deliver training, and shape policies and procedures to support affirmative civil enforcement and to ensure that USAOs have the necessary resources to carry out their missions.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General’s Cooperative Achievement Award
The HHS Inspector General’s Cooperative Achievement Award is given each year to reward exemplary collaboration on case work involving healthcare fraud matters. The selected recipients have demonstrated extraordinary work on a national level in detecting and combating health care fraud, waste, and abuse. The awards ceremony will take place later this year.
AUSAs Veronica Finkelstein and Charlene Keller Fullmer. Finkelstein and Fullmer (as well as team members from the HHS Office of Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice in Washington, DC, and other U.S. Attorney’s offices) are receiving this award for their work in the Health Management Associates (“HMA”) case. The award recognizes their contribution to the $260 million multi-district resolution of several qui tam suits against HMA, its hospitals Lancaster Regional and Heart of Lancaster, and the physicians group Physicians Alliance Ltd. (“PAL”).
Finkelstein and Fullmer directly handled a $55 million component of that settlement resolving allegations that the defendants paid kickbacks to physicians at HMA facilities, including PAL members, who solicited and/or received kickbacks. The financial relationships between the HMA defendants, including subsidiaries and referring physicians, allegedly violated a host of laws, including the Anti-Kickback Statute. There were numerous kickback methods involved in the scheme: physicians participating in whole-hospital joint ventures of HMA facilities, physicians receiving excessive compensation, physicians receiving bogus co-management fees, and physicians receiving bogus medical directorship fees. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/national-hospital-chain-will-pay-over-260-million-resolve
The HMA multi-district resolution is one of the largest False Claims Act cases involving hospital systems in the Department’s history, in terms of the number of qui tam actions filed against a single healthcare provider across multiple districts. The HMA case also is remarkable in its scope of collaboration because it involved both criminal prosecutions and parallel civil enforcement proceedings.
Philadelphia Gang Member Convicted by Jury of Murder and Additional Drugs and Firearms CrimesRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Bryant Calloway a/k/a “Bigs,” 32, of Philadelphia, was convicted today by a jury of one count of murder. He was also convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute 280 grams or more of cocaine base; one count of using, carrying, brandishing and discharging a firearm during a drug trafficking crime; one count of maintaining a house for drug distribution (and doing so within 1,000 feet of a playground); and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
The defendant and his co-conspirators were part of a single drug-trafficking organization (DTO) that distributed crack cocaine in and around an area known colloquially as “the Pit” – a playground located near the area of 5101 Reno Street in the Mill Creek section of West Philadelphia. The DTO operated to distribute crack cocaine from at least as early as 2009 and continued through 2015. During its duration, the conspiracy used several different locations to distribute crack cocaine, as well as several locations to store, manufacture, and package crack cocaine for distribution. In order to further their drug distribution, the members of the DTO routinely possessed and used firearms.
Beginning in summer 2013, the defendant began making attempts to take control of a portion of the crack sales being conducted in “the Grounds,” a nearby playground basketball court which was controlled by a competing crack distribution group. The defendant and others felt that they were not selling enough crack near “the Pit” and sought to sell crack at night in “the Grounds,” which had a higher volume of crack customers and presented an opportunity to make more money. “The Grounds” organization resisted “the Pit’s” requests to sell crack in “the Grounds.” As a result of the dispute, on August 5, 2013, the defendant and another individual entered into “the Grounds” and shot and killed a man who was a crack distributor for “the Grounds” organization.
In retaliation for the murder, members of “the Grounds” organization conspired to shoot Calloway. As a result of those efforts, Calloway was shot and injured. Calloway survived his injuries, but told officers that he did not see who shot him. Within twenty-four hours of the shooting of Calloway, one of the members of “the Pit” traveled to an area controlled by the “Grounds” and fired multiple rounds down a residential street. An innocent bystander (not associated with “the Grounds” organization) was shot and injured.
“The defendant shot and murdered another individual in a drug turf dispute,” U.S. Attorney McSwain said. “Drug trafficking begets violence. Violence only begets more violence. As a result of the murder, more people – including the defendant himself and an innocent bystander – were also shot. My Office is committed to keeping the streets of our community safe from these kinds of horrific acts.”
“The ATF is committed to working with our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners to target violent drug trafficking organizations that are responsible for drug trafficking and related gun violence in our communities,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Donald Robinson. “This conviction is a perfect example of the collaborative effort between the ATF and the Philadelphia Police Department to target those violent offenders.”
"The investigation, arrest, and successful prosecution of Bryant Calloway serves as an example of the effectiveness of strong and consistent collaboration between law enforcement agencies," said Richard J. Ross Jr., Philadelphia Police Commissioner. "We anticipate that this conviction will further disrupt narcotics trafficking and attendant criminal activity in the Mill Creek section of our city and have an appreciable impact on the quality of life of our residents.”
The case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Philadelphia Police Department, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jonathan Ortiz and Seth Schlessinger.
Former Pediatric Medical Assistant Pleads Guilty to Child Sexual ExploitationRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Cameron Carlucci, 27, of Philadelphia, PA, entered a guilty plea today to a federal indictment which charged him with two counts of distribution of child pornography, and one count of possession of child pornography. The indictment stemmed from an investigation that determined Carlucci was trafficking in child pornography over the Internet for almost four years, from 2015 through his arrest in 2018. During that time, he amassed more than 56,000 images and videos that depicted mostly prepubescent boys, infants, and toddlers being sexually abused and exploited.
At the time that Carlucci distributed these images and videos over the Internet, he worked at Valley Pediatrics in Warminster, PA as a medical technician. To obtain employment with Valley Pediatrics, Carlucci falsified his application by denying his criminal history, which included a 2011 Pennsylvania conviction for possession of obscene materials and other sexual materials.
As a result of his guilty plea, Carlucci faces a statutory maximum of 60 years’ imprisonment, a 5-year mandatory minimum sentence of imprisonment, 5 years up to a lifetime of supervised release, a $750,000 fine, and $15,300 special assessment.
“Carlucci’s years of taking advantage of our community’s most vulnerable victims is reprehensible, but it is intensified by the fact that he had daily contact with children in a job he never should have had in the first place,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Child exploitation is a pervasive problem – one that demands an aggressive response. We stand ready with our federal partners to identify and dismantle online forums that perpetuate this abuse.”
“Child exploitation cases are among the most disturbing the FBI works,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “They’re also some of the most impactful. We’re gratified to help take Cameron Carlucci off the street. Not only was he heavily involved with child pornography, but he purposely hid his criminal past to gain employment that allowed him daily interaction with children. If child predators can’t or won’t keep themselves away from kids, the FBI stands ready to step in and shut them down.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Rotella.
Prime Healthcare Services and CEO, Dr. Prem Reddy, to Pay $1.25 Million to Settle False Claims Act AllegationsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Prime”) and Prime’s Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Prem Reddy, have agreed to pay the United States $1.25 million to settle allegations that two Prime hospitals in Pennsylvania – Roxborough Memorial Hospital in Philadelphia and Lower Bucks Hospital in Bristol – knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare by engaging in the following conduct: (1) admitting patients to the hospital for overnight stays who required only less costly, outpatient care and (2) billing for more expensive patient diagnoses than the patients had (the latter practice known as “up-coding”).
“We are committed to ensuring that hospitals, companies that own and operate them, and their executives appropriately bill Medicare,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Charging the government for more costly services than what the patient actually needs and billing the government for more serious diagnoses than what the patient actually has is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Those who engage in these practices will be held accountable.”
Headquartered in Ontario, California, Prime is one of the largest hospital systems in the nation, with 45 acute-care hospitals located in 14 states. Prime acquired Roxborough Memorial Hospital on February 22, 2012, and Lower Bucks Hospital on October 3, 2012.
The Settlement resolves allegations that Prime submitted or caused the submission of fraudulent claims to Medicare. Specifically, from the date that Prime acquired Roxborough and Lower Bucks through September 30, 2013, under Prime management, Roxborough and Lower Bucks hospitals admitted emergency room Medicare patients for costly and medically unnecessary one- and two-day overnight hospital stays, instead of treating the patients in less costly outpatient service or keeping them under observation. In addition, from the dates of acquisition through December 31, 2014, the hospitals upcoded inpatient diagnoses (i.e., billed Medicare for more serious medical conditions than the patients actually had) to increase Medicare payments.
As part of a separate lawsuit in the Central District of California, Prime and Dr. Reddy paid the United States $65 million dollars in August 2018 to settle similar Medicare fraud allegations arising out of 14 Prime hospitals in California.
Also in August 2018, Prime, Roxborough Memorial Hospital, Lower Bucks Hospital, and Dr. Reddy entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) requiring the company to engage in significant compliance efforts over the next five years. Under the agreement, Prime is required to retain an independent review organization to review the accuracy of the company’s claims for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.
“We expect health care companies to accurately bill federal health care programs for services they provide, not pad profits by charging for more expensive services than were actually provided,” said Maureen Dixon, Special Agent in Charge for the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Philadelphia Regional Office. “Our investigators will ensure those who launch such deceptive schemes are held accountable.”
This settlement resolves a lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act (FCA) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by an employee and former employee of Roxborough Memorial Hospital. Under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the FCA, private citizens are permitted to bring lawsuits on behalf of the United States and obtain a portion of the government’s recovery. The FCA also permits the government to intervene and take over the lawsuit.
“We thank the relators for their invaluable contribution in this case. Together with their lawyers, they provided vital assistance to the government throughout this case. Without information from citizens like the relators, detecting fraud and conserving government program funds would be far more difficult,” said U.S Attorney McSwain.
The government’s resolution of this matter illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).
The case was investigated by the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jacqueline Romero and Judith Amorosa, and Health Care Fraud auditor Dawn Wiggins, in coordination with Senior Trial Counsel Marie Bonkowski of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch
The case is captioned United States ex rel. Jane Doe v. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc., et al., No. 14-cv-1695 (E.D.Pa.). The claims resolved by this settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.
Allentown Man Charged with Aggravated Identity Theft and FraudRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Jose Anico 69, of Allentown, PA was indicted by a federal grand jury and charged with one count of false statements in connection with an application for a passport, one count of aggravated identity theft, five counts of wire fraud, and four counts of health care fraud.
The indictment charges the defendant with acquiring the identifying information of a United States Citizen who was a resident of New York City and who died on August 13, 1999. Anico used the victim’s name, date of birth, and Social Security number for various purposes, including applying for and receiving Social Security Administration benefits, Medicare benefits, a Pennsylvania driver’s license, and a United States passport.
From May 2002 through November 2018, Anico received more than $475,000 in government benefits that he was not entitled to receive under his assumed name.
“Aggravated identity theft and fraud are serious crimes,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “My Office is committed to making sure that the personal identifying information of our citizens is protected and not stolen or abused. We are also committed to ensuring that no one steals money or services from the federal government.”
Robert Castro, Resident Agent In Charge of the DSS Philadelphia Resident Office said, “Today’s indictment demonstrates how our presence at more than 275 diplomatic missions worldwide positions us well to target passport fraud and other related crimes with a transnational nexus.”
If convicted, Anico faces a maximum penalty 152 years’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, forfeiture and restitution, a $2,750,000 fine, and a $1,100 special assessment.
The case was investigated by the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Philadelphia Resident Office in partnership with the DSS Regional Security Office in Santo Domingo, the Social Security Administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Everett Witherell.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Fourteen Individuals Charged for Operating “Pill Mills” and Illegally Prescribing Drugs to Hundreds of Patients in Multiple Locations in the Philadelphia AreaRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced two indictments charging 14 people with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to dispense and distribute controlled substances outside the course of professional practice and without a legitimate medical purpose; distribution of oxycodone; health care fraud; and maintaining a drug-involved premises. These charges are the result of coordinated law enforcement effort across multiple federal, state, and local agencies. U.S. Attorney McSwain announced these charges as part of a press conference held today to highlight the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s recent efforts to combat the opioid crisis in the District.
Criminal Indictment No. 18-CR-101: Advanced Urgent Care (AUC). This superseding indictment charges 13 defendants with crimes in connection with their employment at AUC, a medical business with office locations at 5058 City Avenue in Philadelphia, PA; 9432 East Roosevelt Boulevard in Philadelphia, PA; 721 Bethlehem Pike in Montgomeryville, PA; and 126 Easton Road in Willow Grove, PA.
The 13 defendants charged in this indictment are Dr. Mehdi Nikparvar-Fard, 49, of Penn Valley, PA; Dr. Vincent Thompson, 70, of Elkins Park, PA; Dr. Loretta Brown, 65, of Landsowne, PA; Dr. Avrom Brown, 70, of Elkins Park, PA; Dr. Frederick Reichle, 83, of Warrington, PA; Dr. Marcus Rey Williams, 70, of Coatesville, PA; Dr. William Demedio, 58, of Springfield, PA; Dr. Neil Cutler, 77, of Warminster, PA; Physician’s Assistant Mitchell White, 33, of Philadelphia, PA; Physician’s Assistant Jason Dillinger, 40, of West Chester, PA; Physician’s Assistant Debra Cortez, 56, of Bristol, PA; Physician’s Assistant Samantha Hollis, 42, of Wilmington, DE, and Office Manager Joanne Rivera, 35, of Pennsauken, NJ. Each defendant is charged with maintaining a drug-involved premises, and five defendants (Nikparvar-Fard, Rivera, Dillinger, Thompson, and White) are charged with conspiring to unlawfully distribute controlled substances.
AUC was owned and operated by Dr. Mehdi Nikparvar-Fard. The indictment alleges that, in exchange for an $80 to $140 office fee, members of the public were offered “pain management” by AUC doctors and physician’s assistants. Pain management typically involved obtaining a prescription for opioid painkillers. The superseding indictment further alleges that AUC medical providers unlawfully prescribed controlled substances, such as opioid painkillers, on a daily basis from January of 2014 through August of 2017 and routinely ignored warning signs that patients were abusing and/or selling their prescription painkillers. The warning signs included urine drug screens that were positive for illicit drugs like heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine, urine drug screens that were positive for Suboxone (a drug used to treat opiate addiction), and urine drug screen that were negative for all drugs, suggesting the patients may have been selling their prescription pills. In the face of these test results, AUC medical providers nonetheless prescribed enormous quantities of opioid painkillers. According to the indictment, at least 3,678 illegal prescriptions were issued by AUC’s doctors and physician’s assistants.
Criminal Indictment No. 18-CR-591: Drs. Murray Soss and Frederick Reichle. This indictment charges Dr. Murray Soss, 78, of Philadelphia, PA, and Dr. Frederick Reichle,[1] 83, of Warrington, PA, with conspiracy to distribute and dispense oxycodone, outside the usual course of practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose. Dr. Soss is also charged with seven counts of distributing oxycodone and seven counts of health care fraud.
As alleged in the indictment, Soss hired Reichle to write oxycodone prescriptions for Soss’s pain management patients after Soss’s Pennsylvania medical license was suspended in April 2017. Soss and Reichle charged the patients a fee to obtain oxycodone prescriptions, written by Reichle, that were not medically necessary. At times, Soss allegedly collected $2,500 in exchange for accepting a new patient for the sole purpose of that patient obtaining Schedule II narcotics. The indictment further states that Reichle provided oxycodone prescriptions to one of Soss’s patients without this patient being present, and claims Soss was engaged in a sexual relationship with this same patient. It further states that Soss obtained oxycodone prescriptions in Soss’s name and then distributed the prescriptions to this patient in exchange for sexual favors.
If convicted, these 14 defendants face a range of penalties, including substantial prison time and fines, depending on each defendant’s degree of involvement in the alleged crimes.
“Our country is in the midst of a deadly drug epidemic, and our District is, in many ways, ground zero in combatting this crisis,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “As alleged in these indictments, thousands of illegally prescribed pills flooded our streets because of the conduct of these defendants. My Office will continue to do its part to enforce our nation’s drug laws and hold physicians, physician’s assistants, and their agents accountable. As these indictments show, medical professionals who violate their oaths and exploit their patients’ addictions to make an easy buck will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
“We're seeing it over and over again: medical professionals, deciding to cash in on our area’s opioid crisis,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “It seems ‘first, do no harm’ is a principle fast forgotten when money starts changing hands. These doctors are just doling out piles of pills to anyone willing to pay for them. It’s despicable, it’s criminal, and the FBI and our law enforcement partners will never stop working to put pill mills, and the people who run them, out of business.”
“The defendants arrested in this case are accused of setting up and operating a scheme in which the defendants sold opioid prescriptions to individuals without any legitimate medical need or purpose in exchange for cash. The defendants issued 3,678 prescriptions which amount to hundreds of thousands of pills being used by addicted individuals,” said Jonathan A. Wilson, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) Philadelphia Field Division. “When the DEA determines that a doctor is prescribing controlled substance medications without a legitimate medical purpose, the DEA will refer the investigation to the US Attorney’s Office for prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.”“Healthcare providers who ignore their Hippocratic oaths and put illegal prescription drugs on our streets are nothing more than drug dealers in white lab coats,” said Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge of the Philadelphia Regional Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS-OIG). “Medical providers who disregard the law and put greed in front of helping patients can expect criminal repercussions.”
“An important mission of the Office of Inspector General is to investigate allegations of health care fraud related to the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners and OWCP to protect the integrity of DOL’s benefit programs,” stated Richard Deer, Special Agent in Charge, Philadelphia Region, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General.
The AUC case was investigated by the following agencies: Drug Enforcement Administration; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; the Department of Labor, Office of the Inspector General; and the Office of Personnel Management. These agencies were assisted in their investigation by the Pennsylvania Department of State; Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General; Abington Police Department; Easttown Township Police Department; and Philadelphia Police Department. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jason P. Bologna and Seth Schlessinger.
The Soss/Reichle case was investigated by Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Investigation, with assistance from Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General and the Philadelphia Police Department. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Karen Marston.
[1] Dr. Reichle also is a named co-defendant in the AUC superseding indictment, though the charges alleged in the AUC case arise from conduct that is separate from that alleged in Soss/Reichle case.
Federal Law Enforcement Efforts to Combat the Opioid CrisisRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – On February 6, 2019, United States Attorney William M. McSwain convened a press conference to highlight the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s recent efforts to combat the opioid crisis. U.S. Attorney McSwain announced two separate criminal indictments charging 14 individuals with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to dispense and distribute controlled substances outside the course of professional practice and without a legitimate medical purpose; distribution of oxycodone; health care fraud; and maintaining a drug-involved premises. U.S. Attorney McSwain also announced details about a civil lawsuit his Office has filed to prevent the establishment of a facility in Philadelphia where drug users would go to inject themselves with illegal narcotics. The suit, filed against the nonprofit corporation Safehouse and its Executive Director, Jeanette Bowles, seeks a judicial decree that Safehouse’s planned opening of one or more so-called “consumption rooms” would violate federal law. This lawsuit is the first of its kind in the United States.
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery
Good morning. I’m Bill McSwain, the U.S. Attorney, and I am here today to update the public on our ongoing efforts to combat the opioid epidemic in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and to make some specific announcements about several important cases in our District.
First, I want to recognize and thank the representatives from multiple federal, state, and local law enforcement partners that are here today as part of our announcement of two recent criminal indictments. Thank you to the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; the Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General; the Office of Personnel Management; Pennsylvania Department of State; the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General; the Abington Police Department; the Easttown Township Police Department, and the Philadelphia Police Department.
I also want to thank Greg David, the Chief of our Civil Division at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, who is here with me to announce developments on the civil enforcement front.
Our collaborative approach to attacking the opioid epidemic includes aggressive criminal prosecutions and other initiatives to promote awareness, prevention, and addiction recovery. On both the criminal and civil side, we continue to focus on stopping the illicit production, distribution, and use of opioids. It is our duty to hold accountable those who have flooded our streets with heroin, synthetic opioids, and prescription opioids, and we will continue to indict and aggressively prosecute, including through civil penalty, everyone in that supply chain: manufacturers, importers, distributors, doctors, pharmacies, organized crime, and street dealers. Those who make money by illegally exploiting addiction will be caught and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Prosecuting doctors who run “pill mills” and commit Medicare fraud is a priority for the Department of Justice and this Office, and two recent cases in the Eastern District are excellent examples of our work in this area. In one case, we charged physicians Murray Soss and Frederick Reichle with operating a pill mill medical practice out of Dr. Soss’s medical office in Philadelphia, and charged Dr. Soss with healthcare fraud for billing medically unnecessary charges to Medicare. The indictment describes an elaborate scheme in which Dr. Soss paid others to recruit so-called “patients” seeking oxycodone and then paid Dr. Reichle to write prescriptions for those patients in Dr. Soss’s office, even though they had no medical need for the prescriptions. According to the indictment, Dr. Soss recruited Dr. Reichle after his own medical license was suspended by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). And in one particularly heinous example, Dr. Soss even directed Dr. Reichle to write oxycodone prescriptions for a long-time patient with whom Dr. Soss had a sexual relationship, knowingly feeding this victim’s addiction in order to obtain sexual favors.
In a second recent case, we have charged eight physicians, four physicians’ assistants, and an office manager in connection with the operation of a pill mill at Advanced Urgent Care (or AUC). AUC is a provider of medical services, including pain management, with four locations throughout the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The superseding indictment charges Dr. Frederick Reichle (again) along with Dr. Mehdi Nikparvar-Fard, Dr. Vincent Thompson, Dr. Loretta Brown, Dr. Avrom Brown, Dr. Marcus Rey Williams, Dr. William Demedio, and Dr. Neil Cutler; Physician’s Assistants Mitchell White, Jason Dillinger, Debra Cortez, and Samantha Hollis; and Office Manager Joanne Rivera, with multiple drug crimes.
Through a long-term, coordinated, multi-agency investigation, it became clear that AUC was functioning as a “pill mill” in its treatment of pain management patients. Our law enforcement partners worked with our Office to uncover a whopping number of illegal prescriptions – at least 3,678 alleged illegal prescriptions that were medically unnecessary. We uncovered a pattern of abuse where these doctors and physician’s assistants provided patient after patient with oxycodone – often despite clear evidence of overt illicit drug use and despite no diagnostic reason supporting the prescriptions.
As we work to stem the tide of illegal, medically unnecessary prescriptions, we remain committed to taking out violent drug-traffickers who operate on the streets and suppliers who cause overdose deaths. Recently, working again with the DEA, we secured a guilty verdict against Angel Luis Concepcion-Rosario, of Reading, Pennsylvania, for trafficking in fentanyl. Fentanyl, of course, is the deadliest and most unpredictable opioid we see on the streets, and fentanyl is a major source of the spike in overdose deaths in Philadelphia.
A federal jury also recently convicted Emma Semler of Collegeville, Pennsylvania, for distributing heroin and thereby killing her friend. The jury at the Semler trial heard about how the defendant supplied the victim with heroin, watched as she injected it, and then fled the scene when she realized the victim was overdosing on the bathroom floor of a fast-food restaurant in West Philadelphia, leaving her to die. Both defendants - Concepcion-Rosario and Semler - await sentencing, and we will do everything in our power to ensure they receive the punishment that they both deserve.
I’m grateful for the hard work of our agency partners and of those in my Office who prosecuted these cases, especially Assistant United States Attorneys Karen Marston, Jason Bologna, Seth Schlessinger, Kishan Nair, Randy Hsia, and Nicole Phillips. By enforcing our drug laws in these cases and others, we prevent addiction and violence from spreading.
Beyond our criminal prosecutions and civil enforcement work, our Office participates in many types of outreach programs that focus on prevention and addiction recovery. One such program of particular note is Relapse Prevention Court, a program just launched in October 2018 in coordination with the U.S. District Court, the Federal Defenders’ Office, and U.S. Pretrial Services. Relapse Prevention Court helps non-violent drug users who have entered the criminal justice system to maximize opportunities for long-term recovery from substance abuse while they complete their terms of supervised release. The key attribute of this program is that it provides participants with a path forward to long-term addiction recovery while abiding by federal, state, and local laws.
The work that we do in all these areas helps to keep drugs out of our communities and sends a powerful deterrent message. And this work helps to save lives.
Today also marks a new chapter in the federal government’s fight against the opioid epidemic. Philadelphia is, in many ways, ground zero in this crisis. That is why my Office, and our dedicated federal, state, and local law enforcement partners, stand together today to reassure the community that we are aggressively fighting this epidemic by deploying all of the tools and resources at our disposal.
I am here to announce that the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has filed a federal civil lawsuit – the first of its kind in the United States – to ask the U.S. District Court to declare that so-called “supervised injection sites” violate federal law. Because these deadly drug injection sites undoubtedly do violate the law. And because it is the Department’s job to promote and enforce the rule of law, not to look the other way. Normalizing the use of deadly drugs like heroin and fentanyl is not the answer to solving the opioid epidemic.
The civil lawsuit that we have filed names Safehouse, a private, non-profit corporation formed for the specific purpose of opening a deadly drug injection site in the Kensington neighborhood of Philadelphia. Safehouse was incorporated in August 2018, after the Philadelphia Mayor’s Office publicly endorsed the idea of opening an injection site and Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner pledged not to bring charges against those who fund, operate, or use such sites.
Emboldened by the Mayor’s support and the District Attorney’s blessing, Safehouse ramped up its operations in the months that followed. Its website described how the site would be operated: as drug users arrived at Safehouse, staff would direct them to a “consumption room,” provide them with drug paraphernalia, and observe the users as they prepare and inject themselves with illegal narcotics. Safehouse’s staff would monitor the users for signs of overdose and, if necessary, step in and try to provide overdose reversal services.
Let’s step back for a moment, consider the big picture, and discuss what we really know about injections sites. Safehouse claims that an injection site in Philadelphia would “save lives.” But are we sure about that? Consider the study the City of Philadelphia commissioned to evaluate this very issue. The way the study qualified its recommendations is telling:
The vast majority of the available evidence in recent years comes from only one Supervised Consumption Facility, the [facility] in Vancouver, Canada. The current models for harm-reduction estimates are sensitive to population-specific factors. In turn, hyper-local population-level characteristics . . . and social and economic factors determine the need and potential utilization by [drug users] of Supervised Consumption Facilities. The majority of the available literature with useful statistical methodology and analysis relies more commonly on the Vancouver Supervised Consumption Facility than on any other site. It is uncertain how relevant or applicable the assumptions are to communities in other geographies.
The study, by Main Line Health Center at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, went on to caution that “[b]ecause it appears that existing Supervised Consumption Sites have not incorporated rigorous evaluation into their design and implementation, it has been difficult to disentangle the full impact of Supervised Consumption Sites on relevant harm-reduction outcomes.”
Translation: the study has no idea whether an injection site in Philadelphia would actually save lives. So when Safehouse declares that an injection site would save lives, all they’re doing is speculating and trying to pass it off as fact. They have no proof and no reliable data. There is no expert consensus that this plan would do any good for anybody.
But here is what we do know: setting up a drug house is illegal. And on the legal issues in this case, our position has remained firm and our communications to Safehouse clear. Safehouse’s operation would violate federal law, namely, section 856(a)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act. That section makes it unlawful to “manage or control any place” that is “knowingly and intentionally . . . ma[d]e available for use . . . for the purpose of unlawfully . . . using a controlled substance.” On November 9, 2018, I sent a letter to Safehouse, advising that if it went forward with its plans as described, my Office would pursue appropriate remedies unless Safehouse provided me with assurances that it would comply with the law. In response, Safehouse provided no such assurances, and its actions (most recently, its hiring of an Executive Director last month) point to the opposite conclusion.
The law is clear – and my job is to respect and enforce the rule of law. If Safehouse wants to operate an injection site, it should work through the democratic process to try to change the law. It should not expect prosecutors to turn a blind eye to wholesale illegal behavior and play politics by allowing political ideologies to determine their prosecutorial decisions. That would be an abandonment of my oath to enforce the law. While that may be a way of life for the Philadelphia District Attorney, it is something that I will never do.
And how much political support do injection sites really have among our law making bodies, anyway? The answer is none. Congress does not support the idea, the Pennsylvania legislature does not support it, nor does the Philadelphia City Council. Councilwoman Maria Quinones Sanchez, whose district includes Kensington, does not support injection sites. Governor Wolf does not support them, nor does Pennsylvania Attorney General Shapiro.
What is Safehouse’s response to this lack of support and to the fact that it is illegal under federal law to set up a drug house? Their response is defiance. Their response is that they are beholden to a supposedly higher power than our laws; they are beholden to saving lives. While I do not doubt Safehouse’s good intentions, substituting its judgment in place of the law is not the way that democracy works. It is not the way that a republic works. If Safehouse doesn’t like the law, it should channel its efforts into changing it. The bottom line is that when it comes to our justice system, there is no higher purpose than respecting the rule of law when our laws are consistent with our Constitution and enacted by our democratically elected representatives. If you think that you’re above the law, you’ll soon find yourself in court to account for your actions. That is exactly the situation here.
In closing, the lawsuit that we have filed is a necessary and important step in the Justice Department’s enforcement of our federal drug laws. But it is just one part of my Office’s comprehensive approach to addressing the opioid crisis. Again, I want to thank all of the law enforcement partners here today; we are proud to stand with you as we fight this crisis together.
Thank you, and at this time, I am happy to take your questions relating to these announcements.
Civil Lawsuit Filed to Seek Judicial Declaration that Drug Injection Site Is Illegal Under Federal LawRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that his Office has filed a civil lawsuit to prevent the establishment of a facility in Philadelphia where drug users would go to inject themselves with illegal narcotics. The suit, filed against the nonprofit corporation Safehouse and its Executive Director, Jeanette Bowles, seeks a judicial decree that Safehouse’s planned opening of one or more so-called “consumption rooms” would violate federal law. This lawsuit is the first of its kind filed in the United States.
In response to the city’s opioid crisis, Safehouse announced last fall its intention to open a location for drug users to inject street-purchased heroin and fentanyl under medical supervision of Safehouse employees. With tacit backing from city officials, including Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner who promised not to prosecute those who established or used an injection site, Safehouse plans to open the nation’s first consumption room in Philadelphia imminently.
While U.S. Attorney McSwain emphasized that community organizations play an important role in combatting the opioid scourge, he cautioned that any response must be legal. “I recognize that we are all on the same side in this fight,” he said. “The proponents of the injection site share our goal of ending this terrible epidemic. We all want solutions that save lives, but allowing private citizens to break long-established federal drug laws passed by Congress is not an acceptable path forward.”
Safehouse’s proposed consumption room would violate the federal Controlled Substances Act, a comprehensive regulatory scheme enacted in 1970. The Act makes it a felony to maintain any place for the purpose of facilitating illicit drug use. According to the government, that is exactly what Safehouse plans to do.
“So-called ‘supervised injection sites’ would break the law, plain and simple,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “The law is clear – and it is my job to respect and enforce the rule of law. If Safehouse wants to operate an injection site, it should work through the democratic process to try to change the law. But normalizing the use of deadly drugs like heroin and fentanyl and ignoring the law is not the answer to solving the opioid epidemic.”
“The Department of Justice’s Civil Division is committed to using every tool at its disposal to combat the opioid crisis, and that includes stopping the establishment of centers where individuals can go to illegally use and abuse dangerous drugs,” said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt for the Department of Justice’s Civil Division. “Operating spaces for the purpose of allowing the use of illegal drugs like heroin and fentanyl violates federal law and creates serious public safety risks. The Civil Division will not hesitate to bring actions like this against any state, city, municipality, or private entity that attempts to open a so-called ‘safe-injection site.’”
In partnership with federal, state, and local law enforcement, the United States Attorney’s Office prioritizes cutting off the supply of illegal opioids, prosecuting drug dealers and traffickers, and enforcing civil rights laws to ensure that people suffering from addiction have access to treatment. Local government and community organizations play a critical role in providing effective treatment options, making overdose prevention medication more readily available, and leading prevention efforts.
According to U.S. Attorney McSwain, a partnership between federal, state, and local government, along with community leaders, is needed to implement a coordinated and effective response to the opioid crisis. “I invite a dialogue with our community partners, including Safehouse, to discuss ways we can work together within the law to bring an end to this epidemic,” he said.
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental to Pay $135,742 to Resolve False Claims Allegations Arising from Improper Testing of U.S. Army Water SamplesRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced today that Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental LLC, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, has agreed to pay the United States $135,742 to resolve allegations that it billed the U.S. Army for testing numerous water samples after a Eurofins employee had improperly manipulated or changed the results. Eurofins has terminated the employee, retested the affected samples, and implemented changes to prevent similar misconduct.
In 2017, an investigation was launched after Eurofins disclosed to the United States that between June 21, 2016 and September 14, 2017, an employee in its Lancaster, Pennsylvania laboratory had improperly manipulated quality control data and altered the test results of numerous water samples. Eurofins had contracted with the U.S. Army Public Health Command to test environmental samples, and Eurofins had billed the government $67,871 for testing of 1436 water samples, the results of which the employee had manipulated or altered. Eurofins disclosed information related to its former employee’s misconduct and cooperated with the government’s investigation.
“Government contractors are accountable for their employees’ conduct, especially when they are relied on to ensure the public health of personnel working and living on U.S. military facilities,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “This resolution should remind contractors of the high value we place on safeguarding our military service members and civilian employees. We commend Eurofins for coming forward to disclose the issues and for working with the federal government and other regulators to bring its practices into compliance with the law.”
“This settlement further demonstrates the resolve of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit and our law enforcement partners to protect and defend the assets of the United States Army,” stated Special Agent in Charge L. Scott Moreland, of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit’s Mid‑Atlantic Fraud Field Office.
“The settlement agreement announced today is the result of a joint investigative effort,” stated Leigh-Alistair Barzey, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) Northeast Field Office. “DCIS will continue to work with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command to ensure the integrity of the Defense Department’s procurement system.”
The case was handled by Assistant United States Attorney Mark J. Sherer with investigative assistance from auditor Denis Cooke, the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit, and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
EDPA Announces 2018 Affirmative Civil Enforcement AchievementsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA, PA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain today announced calendar year 2018 affirmative civil enforcement (ACE) achievements by the U.S. Attorney’s Office Civil Division. As the 2018 achievements demonstrate, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (EDPA) continues to have one of the busiest and most prolific Civil Divisions in the country.
For calendar year 2018, the EDPA Civil Division recovered over $115.5 million in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud against the government. These matters originated largely from qui tam, or whistleblower filings and agency referrals. Of that amount, over $108 million resulted from False Claims Act (FCA) cases, largely from those alleging healthcare fraud violations. Whistleblowers recovered over $18 million from these resolutions. During the same calendar year, EDPA opened a record-setting number of ACE investigations into alleged fraud on the government, Controlled Substances Act violations, and civil rights violations.
“We sincerely thank the whistleblowers and their counsel who have brought these matters to the attention of the United States. Without the willingness of relators to shed light on allegations of fraud, preserving government program funds would be far more challenging. Their efforts played a vital role in the resolution of these cases,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.
“We also thank our federal law enforcement partners, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management Office of the Inspector General, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Railroad Retirement Board Office of the Inspector General. The agency support and dedication in these matters is critical to the success of our civil enforcement.”
“We plan to build on these achievements in 2019,” continued U.S. Attorney McSwain. “I anticipate that the newly created ACE Strike Force will help us realize even greater success this year.” In August 2018, the U.S. Attorney formed the ACE Strike Force. It consists of five Assistant U.S. Attorneys within the Civil Division who focus their efforts on ACE work. Its mission is to pursue complex fraud investigations, including FCA whistleblower cases, combat the opioid crisis through civil enforcement, and enforce federal civil rights statutes.
“The Civil Division will continue to build its robust pipeline of ACE cases, and we have every reason to expect to see a large number of complex whistleblower filings under the False Claims Act and agency referrals,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “I expect ongoing ACE success, reflecting the identification and targeting of specific ACE areas including government fraud, Controlled Substances Act enforcement, and civil rights enforcement.”
The following are significant calendar year 2018 achievements:[1]
FCA Healthcare Fraud Settlements
- HMA. In this qui tam against Health Management Associates (HMA), its hospitals Lancaster Regional and Heart of Lancaster, and the physicians group Physicians Alliance Ltd. (PAL), EDPA and DOJ negotiated a large, multi-district $260 million settlement involving medically unnecessary hospital admissions and kickbacks to doctors. The kickback methods included: physicians participating in whole-hospital joint ventures of HMA facilities, physicians receiving excessive compensation, physicians receiving bogus co-management fees, and physicians receiving bogus medical directorship fees. The settlement amount is $55 million for the joint venture piece of the litigation arising out of EDPA, with a global settlement of $260 million for eight qui tams filed in five districts. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/national-hospital-chain-will-pay-over-260-million-resolve
- Abbott. Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Inc. (“Abbott”) agreed to pay $25 million to resolve allegations that it employed kickbacks and unlawful methods of off-label marketing and promotion to induce physicians to prescribe the drug TriCor,® a blockbuster cholesterol reducing drug that was promoted for use in conjunction with other cholesterol lowering medications. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/abbott-laboratories-and-abbvie-inc-pay-25-million-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations
- Coordinated Health and Emil DiIorio, M.D. Coordinated Health Holding Company, LLC (“Coordinated Health”) and its founder, principal owner, and Chief Executive Officer, Emil DiIorio, M.D., agreed to settle allegations that they abused billing modifiers to unbundle surgery codes resulting in false claims submitted to federal health care programs. Coordinated Health agreed to pay $11.25 million and DiIorio agreed personally to pay $1.25 million, for total settlement of $12.5 million. Coordinated Health has also entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that will require regular monitoring of its billing practices for five years. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/coordinated-health-and-ceo-pay-125-million-resolve-false-claims-act-liability
- SouthernCare. SouthernCare, Inc., a hospice care provider, agreed to pay $5,863,426 to the federal government to resolve allegations that the company submitted false claims to Medicare for hospice care that was medically unnecessary or lacked documentation. In their qui tam complaints, the whistleblowers alleged that SouthernCare provided hospice care to patients who were not eligible under the Medicare program. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/hospice-care-provider-pays-nearly-6-million-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations
- I&L Express Pharmacy. I&L Express Pharmacy and its owners agreed to pay $3.2 million to the federal government to resolve allegations that they submitted false claims to Medicare for prescription medications that were not actually dispensed during a six-year period. Significantly, they also agreed to enter into an integrity agreement that requires them to undertake substantial compliance obligations and to contract with an Independent Review Organization that will conduct quarterly audits of their Medicare and Medicaid claims and drug inventory. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/pharmacy-owners-agree-pay-32-million-resolve-false-claims-case
- Community Health Clinics / Dr. Melchor Martinez. In this case, EDPA filed a complaint in intervention of a qui tam alleging that Martinez had been excluded from participating in all federally funded healthcare programs, but had nonetheless continued to own and operate community mental health clinics that billed Medicaid and Medicare. The complaint also alleged widespread fraud in billing for mental health services, billing for services provided by unqualified individuals, and falsifying credentials. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/civil-complaint-alleges-fraud-operators-community-mental-health-clinics The district court entered a $3 million consent judgment on October 18, 2018, which required the defendants to shut down their remaining Medicare business and for significant periods of exclusion from participation in federally funded healthcare programs for the defendants. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/united-states-obtains-3-million-consent-judgment-and-federal-healthcare-exclusions-0
- Bromedicon. Marshfield Medical, Inc., formerly known as Bromedicon, Inc., agreed to pay $550,000 to resolve a qui tam lawsuit’s allegations that Bromedicon submitted false claims to Medicare and other federal healthcare programs for failing to provide a qualified interpreting physician to monitor each surgery for which it purportedly provided remote Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/intra-operative-monitoring-company-agrees-pay-550000-settle-false-claims-act-claims
- Dr. Banka. Vidya Banka, MD agreed to pay a civil penalty of $126,617 and to a five-year term of exclusion from all federal healthcare programs to settle allegations that he improperly submitted Medicare claims for unnecessary cardiac stent procedures. The University of Pennsylvania Health System (“UPHS”), which owns Pennsylvania Hospital, brought the matter to the United States’ attention through a voluntary self-disclosure. The United States then continued to investigate Dr. Banka. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/united-states-resolves-claims-philadelphia-cardiologist-billed-medicare-unnecessary
- Rosenbaum. A personal injury law firm, Rosenbaum & Associates, and its principal, Jeffrey Rosenbaum, Esq., agreed to pay $28,000 to resolve allegations that they failed to reimburse the United States for certain Medicare payments the government had previously made to medical providers on behalf of firm clients who sought medical care. The government’s investigation arose under the Medicare Secondary Payer provisions of the Social Security Act. Rosenbaum also agreed to (1) designate a person at the firm responsible for paying Medicare secondary payer debts; (2) train the designated employee to ensure that the firm pays these debts on a timely basis; and (3) review any outstanding debts with the designated employee at least every six months to ensure compliance. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/philadelphia-personal-injury-law-firm-agrees-start-compliance-program-and-reimburse
Controlled Substances Act Enforcement
- Passavant/PDC. Arising from a voluntary self-disclosure, Passavant Memorial Homes, and its subsidiaries Passavant Development Corporation, PDC Pharmacy Philadelphia, PDC Pharmacy Pittsburgh, and PDC Pharmacy Colorado, paid the United States $1,850,000 to resolve allegations that it dispensed controlled substances to patients without a valid prescription in violation of the Controlled Substances Act and FCA. This matter also involved two additional disclosures in coordination with the District of Colorado and the Western District of Pennsylvania. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices worked in close collaboration with each other, HHS, DEA, and Medicaid Fraud Control Units from all three districts to obtain the resolution in this case. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/passavant-memorial-homes-pay-185-million-resolve-allegations-improperly-dispensing
- Dr. Stephen Latman. This civil complaint resulted in a first-of-its-kind consent decree against a physician who had been allegedly overprescribing opioids for years. According to the complaint, Dr. Latman issued 343 opioid prescriptions to three of his patients that lacked a legitimate medical purpose and were issued outside of the usual course of his professional practice. Dr. Latman entered into a Stipulated Order and Consent Judgment, requiring him to pay $400,000 to the United States, prohibiting him from ever seeking a future DEA controlled substance license, requiring him to voluntarily relinquish his license to practice medicine, and requiring him to execute an agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/united-states-files-suit-against-reading-area-physician-opioid-prescribing
- Stephen Humbert, D.O. and Raymond Ferraro, P.A. These medical providers agreed to pay $112,500 to resolve allegations for improperly prescribing opioids to one of their former patients. Additional conditions of compliance with the DEA required regular reporting of their prescriptions for controlled substances and new policies for their opioid patients. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/two-healthcare-providers-agree-pay-over-100000-settle-civil-claims-improper-opioid
FCA Procurement/Grant Fraud Settlements
- Shubhada Industries. EDPA filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Babu Metgud and Shubhada Kalyani, and four companies, Shubhada Industries, d/b/a Shubhada, Inc., Metcon Aerospace & Defense, d/b/a Metcon Industries, NRI Capital Corporation, and The Innovation Technology & Enterprise Development Center, Inc., for a scheme to overcharge the military for spare vehicle parts. The United States, as the plaintiff, moved for summary judgment against Metgud and Kalyani. In granting the United States’ motion, the district court entered judgment against the individual defendants, awarding damages and imposing the maximum penalty allowable under the FCA. The couple has been ordered to pay $232,891.37 to the United States. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/lawsuit-filed-against-defense-contractors-over-alleged-false-claim. The press release for the judgment is here: https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/court-enters-judgment-against-new-jersey-couple-overcharging-military-spare-vehicle
- Scholars in Print. EDPA filed a civil complaint alleging that Scholars in Print and its owners, John Paul Ryan and Mary Motz Ryan, violated the FCA by shipping unordered textbooks to the Federal Bureau of Prisons and demanding payment, in conjunction with a motion asking the court to enter a stipulated order and consent judgment to resolve the matter. The defendants will pay a civil penalty of $75,689 for submitting false claims. They will also refrain from marketing products to any federal agency through unsolicited communications or telemarketing. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/bucks-county-couple-and-telemarketing-firm-agree-pay-penalty-resolve-false-claims-act
FCA Benefits Fraud Settlements
- Richard Cundari. A former Railroad Retirement Board employee resolved civil fraud claims under the FCA for $307,500 concerning allegations that he applied for and received occupational disability annuities that he was ineligible to receive due to income earnings in excess of the applicable limits. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/doylestown-man-pay-307500-resolve-civil-false-claims-allegations-he-illegally-received
[1] The civil claims resolved by settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
- HMA. In this qui tam against Health Management Associates (HMA), its hospitals Lancaster Regional and Heart of Lancaster, and the physicians group Physicians Alliance Ltd. (PAL), EDPA and DOJ negotiated a large, multi-district $260 million settlement involving medically unnecessary hospital admissions and kickbacks to doctors. The kickback methods included: physicians participating in whole-hospital joint ventures of HMA facilities, physicians receiving excessive compensation, physicians receiving bogus co-management fees, and physicians receiving bogus medical directorship fees. The settlement amount is $55 million for the joint venture piece of the litigation arising out of EDPA, with a global settlement of $260 million for eight qui tams filed in five districts. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/national-hospital-chain-will-pay-over-260-million-resolve
Pentec Health, Inc. to Pay $17 Million to Settle False Claims Act AllegationsRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Pentec Health, Inc. (“Pentec”) has agreed to pay the United States $17 million to settle allegations that Pentec submitted false claims to Medicare and other government healthcare programs.
Headquartered in Glen Mills, Pennsylvania, Pentec furnishes a range of renal and specialized pharmacy compounding services, including the compounding of its drug, Proplete, and the provision of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (“IDPN”) and intraperitoneal nutrition (“IPN”) to individuals with end stage renal disease.
The United States alleges that from 2007 to 2018, Pentec billed Medicare and other federal healthcare programs for excessive amounts of product wasted during the compounding of Proplete, and Pentec routinely waived patient copayments and deductible obligations in order to induce the prescription and use of Proplete. Pentec also submitted duplicate and improperly coded claims to the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program.
Along with this Settlement, Pentec has also signed a Corporate Integrity Agreement (“CIA”) with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (“HHS-OIG”) that will require regular monitoring of its billing practices for a period of five years.
“We are committed to ensuring that compounding pharmacies appropriately bill Medicare,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Pentec allegedly padded its bottom line through several improper means, including by charging the government for quantities of medication that its patients did not actually need or receive. Those who engage in these practices will be held accountable.”
“Compounding pharmacies play an integral role in the delivery of quality health care services and are required to follow rules designed to protect patients and prevent the waste of taxpayer funds,” said Maureen Dixon, Special Agent in Charge of HHS-OIG in Philadelphia. “We will continue to work closely with the United States Attorney’s Office to ensure the integrity of taxpayer funds.”
This settlement resolves a lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act (FCA) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by Jean Brasher, a former employee of Pentec, under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the FCA, which permit private citizens to bring lawsuits on behalf of the United States and obtain a portion of the government’s recovery. The FCA also permits the government to intervene and take over the lawsuit. Ms. Brasher was represented by David Bocian, Esq. of Kessler Topaz Melzter & Check, LLP.
“We thank the relator for her invaluable contribution in this case. Together with her lawyers, they provided vital assistance to the government throughout this case. Without information from citizens like the relator, detecting fraud and conserving government program funds would be far more difficult,” said U.S Attorney McSwain.
The government’s resolution of this matter illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).
The case was investigated by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jacqueline C. Romero of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, with assistance from Health Care Fraud auditor George Niedzwicki, HHS-OIG, the United States Office of Personnel Management-Office of Inspector General, and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs-Office of Inspector General.
The case is captioned United States et al. ex rel. Jean Brasher v. Pentec Health, Inc. No. 13-cv-05745 (E.D.Pa.). The claims resolved by this settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability
Man Pleads Guilty in Pennsylvania to Trafficking Protected TurtlesRead the Press Release
David Sommers pleaded guilty today in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to trafficking protected turtles.
On July 10, 2018, a grand jury charged Sommers with smuggling a package containing diamondback terrapins to Canada and several Lacey Act offenses for mislabeling the package and trafficking turtles domestically. Sommers pleaded guilty to one felony count of violating the Lacey Act and agreed to forfeit nearly 3,500 diamondback terrapin hatchlings. The Lacey Act is the nation’s oldest wildlife trafficking statute and prohibits falsely labeling packages containing wildlife, fish, or plants.
Sommers acknowledged that he falsely labeled and trafficked turtles taken from their New Jersey marsh habitat from Aug. 7, 2014, through Oct. 24, 2017. According to the plea agreement, Sommers admitted to sending a package to Canada in 2014 containing 11 terrapin hatchlings. Sommers mislabeled the package as a book and underreported its value to avoid detection by customs authorities. Wildlife authorities from Environment and Climate Change Canada intercepted the package.
Sommers faces a maximum of five years’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, a fine of up to $250,000, and restitution to New Jersey for the value of the turtles. The government agreed to dismiss the remaining charges against Sommers at sentencing, which is scheduled for May 15, 2019.
Diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) are a semi-aquatic species of turtle native to brackish waters in eastern and southern United States. They are not found in the wild in Pennsylvania, where Sommers resided, but have a dwindling habitat range in neighboring New Jersey. The terrapins are prized in the reptile pet trade for their unique, diamond-shaped shell markings. The turtles are protected under New Jersey law and by an international treaty, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
The United States, Canada, and approximately 181 other countries are signatories to CITES, which provides a mechanism for regulating international trade in species whose continued survival is threatened by such trade. Due to declining populations, CITES listed the diamondback terrapin as threatened in 2013, and New Jersey banned collecting, possessing, and transporting them in 2016.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducted the investigation with assistance from the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife. The government is represented by Trial Attorney Ryan Connors of the Environmental Crimes Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Joan Burnes of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Attorney Convicted at Trial of Defrauding Elderly WomanRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced that John Kelvin Conner, 62, was convicted today by a jury of 19 counts of wire fraud and one count of making a false statement to federal agents. The defendant, an attorney, devised and participated in a scheme to defraud an elderly woman out of more than $95,000 so that he could gamble with her money at casinos.
In July 2016, the 85-years old victim signed a Power of Attorney (“POA”) agreement with the defendant that granted him authority to manage the victim’s finances and pay her bills. At the time, the victim lived at home, but required the assistance of multiple caregivers, and her only source of income was a monthly pension. The defendant used the POA agreement to liquidate a life annuity policy that the victim owned, deposit the proceeds into one of her bank accounts, and siphon nearly all of that money for his personal use at casinos.
From August 16, 2016 until April 22, 2017, the defendant used an ATM card to make at least 176 unauthorized withdrawals totaling at least $95,688 from the victim’s bank account at Pennsylvania and New Jersey casinos. During this time, the defendant neglected to pay the victim’s bills, which led to the victim temporarily losing basic utilities like heat, hot water, electricity, and telephone services. Additionally, many checks paid to the home caregivers were returned because of insufficient balances in the victim’s checking account. When questioned by FBI agents about the ATM withdrawals, the defendant falsely told the agents that the victim had authorized him to use her money to gamble at casinos.
“The defendant’s conduct in this case was egregious,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “Stealing an elderly woman’s life-savings, gambling it away at casinos, and then lying about it to federal agents by pretending that he had permission to throw away the victim’s savings so that she couldn’t even afford her necessities – it is hard to fathom that an individual would choose to commit these crimes. We are grateful that the jury saw through the defendant’s lies and held him accountable.”
“For anyone with elderly loved ones, this is the nightmare scenario,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division. “John Conner’s victim was utterly vulnerable, and he took full advantage – robbing her blind to hit the casinos, frittering away her money as her own bills went unpaid. It’s unconscionable. The FBI will never stop working to protect the public from criminals like this, and we’re gratified to see him brought to justice.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Mark Dubnoff.
Super Bowl LIII Anti-Counterfeiting and Piracy Event Held in AtlantaRead the Press Release
ATLANTA, GEORGIA– On January 31, 2019, United States Attorney William M. McSwain spoke at the National Football League’s anti-counterfeiting and piracy press conference held in connection with Super Bowl LIII. U.S. Attorney McSwain announced six separate indictments charging 13 individuals with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods, trafficking in counterfeit goods, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and aiding and abetting.
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery
Each year, the Super Bowl unites Americans in a unique way. It is a celebration of the game, its players, and of the competitive spirit that helps to define our country.
Unfortunately, with all the good that comes along with events like the Super Bowl, there’s an opportunity for criminals to prey on unwitting fans. These events attract people looking to make a quick buck through counterfeiting.
Criminal counterfeiting and piracy are serious crimes. When fans spend their hard-earned money on NFL tickets and merchandise, they deserve the real deal. And today, I am here to announce criminal counterfeiting charges that my Office has brought to help ensure that NFL fans – and all of us – get what we pay for when we attend a big event.
The United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has filed six criminal indictments against multiple defendants, alleging their involvement in a scheme to traffic in counterfeit ticket sales. This widespread conspiracy spanned multiple states, involved 13 defendants, and covered numerous sporting and concert events.
We know from our investigation that the defendants targeted events and their victims based on profitability – the bigger the event, the bigger the payoff. The scheme involved several steps and multiple players: after determining which events would draw the most profit, the schemers would use real tickets, or photographs of real tickets, to print counterfeit ones for the event, and then the sellers would travel to the host city to sell their phony tickets to unwitting fans. This scheme involved sophisticated printing that mimicked the authentic tickets’ markings and hologram.
Many of the individuals that we have charged allegedly defrauded NFL football fans by printing, distributing, and selling counterfeit tickets to Super Bowl LI (51) in Houston (between the Patriots and the Falcons) and Super Bowl LII (52) in Minneapolis (between the Eagles and the Patriots).
In addition to these games, the criminal indictments allege that the schemers targeted other high-profile sporting events, including the Army-Navy football game played in Philadelphia in December 2017; two College Football National Championship games (one played in Tampa, in January 2017, and another played here in Atlanta in January 2018); and various big-ticket basketball games. They also trafficked in counterfeit concert tickets in various venues.
The initial arrests in this case were of two individuals named Eugene Smith and Eric Ferguson, both from the Atlanta metropolitan area. Ferguson is alleged to have printed the counterfeit tickets for Smith, who then supplied the tickets to several additional individuals who solicited buyers and sold them. Both Smith and Ferguson have been charged with producing and distributing counterfeit Super Bowl tickets in 2017 and 2018. Ferguson has pleaded not guilty and awaits trial. Smith has pleaded guilty to four counts and awaits sentencing in custody in Philadelphia.
The second wave of indictments targeted additional printers, distributors, and street-level counterfeit ticket sellers. Multiple arrests occurred earlier this week through a coordinated federal, state, and local effort across multiple states. As fate would have it, one of these individuals, Damon Daniels, was apprehended en route to Atlanta, thanks to the great police work by the Duluth, Georgia police department. The arresting officer reported that Mr. Daniels’s car was filled with printing equipment and cardstock, presumably to resume counterfeit ticket sales at this year’s Super Bowl.
The individuals charged and arrested this week are the following: Rakee Russ, Mustafa Tucker, Malik Brown, Kevin Sadat, Edward Dunmore, Khiale Warren, and Rodney Higginbottom, all of Philadelphia; and Sean Williams, Damon Daniels, Rahiem Watts, and Jermaine Jones, all of New York. These indictments, which are now publicly available and filed with the court, outline the charges and identify which of these individuals are charged with conduct related to counterfeit Super Bowl tickets. We have also prepared a press release that provides additional details about the charges.
If convicted, the defendants face a range of penalties, determined primarily by the amount of the financial loss attributable to each. And by bringing these charges federally, we have assured that many of these individuals will serve serious prison time if convicted.
I want to extend my thanks to FBI Philadelphia for spearheading the investigation and to Special Agent in Charge Michael Harpster and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Joe Bushner for their leadership, and to our local partners who served as boots on the ground – always willing to step in and stop the counterfeit sales, where possible. They acted swiftly when we learned about events unfolding in real time, often as the individuals were meeting their victims. Thank you to the Philadelphia Police Department and Commissioner Richard Ross; to the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office and Attorney General Josh Shapiro and his First Deputy Chief, Bureau of Investigations, John Kitzinger, who is with us today; to the New York Police Department; to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office; to the FBI Field Office in Atlanta; and finally, to BJay Pak, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia and his Office.
This case serves as an important reminder to all of us who enjoy sporting and concert events with friends and family.
Most importantly, when you are buying tickets, consider the source. The safest route is always to purchase from an approved source. Many fans believe that if they are not purchasing tickets from scalpers on the street, they are safe, and that it’s OK to buy tickets on a third-party website because the sellers can be tracked and traced. That is not always the case. The majority of counterfeit sales happen not on the streets, but through the Internet.
The FBI and the Department of Justice take counterfeiting and piracy very seriously. Economic crimes like these will continue to be a focus of my Office and of the Department.
At this time, I would like to introduce my colleague from the FBI Philadelphia Field Office, Assistant Special Agent in Charge Joe Bushner.
Philadelphia La Cosa Nostra Member and Associate Charged with Making and Collecting Extortionate LoansRead the Press Release
PHILADELPHIA – An indictment was unsealed today against a member of the Philadelphia organized crime family of La Cosa Nostra (LCN) and his alleged associate. The indictment charges various crimes involving the making of extortionate loans, conspiracy, and collections of loans by extortionate means.
The charges were announced today by United States Attorney William M. McSwain; Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; and Michael Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Field Division.
The defendants charged in the 15-count indictment are Philadelphia LCN Family member Philip Narducci, 56, and his associate James Gallo, 44.
Both defendants were arrested today and will make initial court appearances in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia at 1:30 pm. EST.
According to the indictment, Narducci allegedly made usurious and extortionate loans involving large amounts of money to a borrower. As set forth in the indictment, when the borrower failed to make weekly interest payments, Narducci allegedly used physical violence through assault and threats of violence to force the borrower to repay the loans. The indictment also alleges that, at Narducci’s direction, Gallo collected weekly interest payments on the usurious loans from the borrower and used threats of violence to facilitate the collections.
“Our citizens deserve to be safe and live without the fear or threat of violence,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “My Office takes organized crime in this District very seriously and will prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law.”
Each charge of making extortionate extortions of credit, conspiracy to collect extensions of credit by extortionate means, and collections of extensions of credit by extortionate means making extortionate extensions of credit, carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
The case is being investigated by the FBI, the Pennsylvania State Police, and the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General. The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney John S. Han of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section.
An indictment is merely an accusation and each defendant is presumed innocent until and unless they are proven guilty.
Members of Counterfeit Ticket Rings Indicted for Trafficking Counterfeit Tickets for Marquee Events, Including the Super BowlRead the Press Release
ATLANTA, GEORGIA – United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced six separate indictments charging 13 individuals with a multitude of crimes, including conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods, trafficking in counterfeit goods, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and aiding and abetting. U.S. Attorney McSwain announced the charges at the NFL’s annual anti-counterfeit merchandise press conference event held in connection with Super Bowl LIII.
The indictments filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and announced today all relate to the production, distribution, and sale of counterfeit tickets to sporting and concert events. This criminal behavior spanned several states and targeted multiple marquee sporting events, including Super Bowl LI, in Houston, Texas, and Super Bowl LII, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The details of each indictment, including the individuals charged and the sporting events that were targeted, are described more fully below. The individual defendants face a range of penalties, largely depending on the amount of financial loss attributable to each.
Case No. 2:18-cr-00306 (RBS) (Smith) and Case No. 2:18-cr-00596 (RBS) (Ferguson)
Eugene Smith, 45, of Lithonia, Georgia, and Eric Ferguson, 50, of Riverdale, Georgia, were both charged by indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods. The indictments allege that Smith purchased real tickets to sporting events and concerts, provided them to his associate, Ferguson, who then printed counterfeit tickets for resale. The indictments further allege that the counterfeit tickets were distributed to a network of individuals who would advertise and sell the counterfeit tickets to unsuspecting fans. The indictments allege that from December 2016 to April 2018, the defendants conspired to traffic in counterfeit tickets for various sporting events, including Super Bowl LI; Super Bowl LII; a College Football Playoff game played in Tampa, Florida; and the Army-Navy Game played in Philadelphia.
Smith has pleaded guilty to all counts in the indictment and awaits sentencing. Ferguson has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial, currently scheduled for February 11, 2019.
Case No. 2:19-cr-00053 (RBS) (Williams et al.)
Sean Williams, 48, Damon Daniels, 48, Rahiem Watts, 30, Jermaine Jones, 41, all of New York, New York, and Rakee Russ, 40, of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods. The indictment alleges a similar pattern of behavior: defendants Daniels and Watts created counterfeit tickets to various sporting events and worked with others, including their indicted co-defendants, to advertise and sell the tickets to unsuspecting victims. It further alleges that that defendants conspired together to produce and sell counterfeit tickets to several sporting and concert events, including Super Bowl LI; an NCAA men’s college basketball game (Villanova University–University of Virginia) played in Philadelphia; an ACC men’s basketball tournament game played in New York City; and a FIFA World Cup qualifier soccer match between the United States and Costa Rica, played in Philadelphia.
Case No. 2:19-cr-0054 (RBS) (Warren and Higginbottom)
Khiale Warren, 52, and Rodney Higginbottom, 51, both of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with trafficking in counterfeit tickets and wire fraud. The indictment alleges that these defendants advertised through a third-party website and sold counterfeit tickets to several events, including the 1916-2016 Copa America Centenario soccer game played in Philadelphia; a Philadelphia Eagles–Minnesota Vikings NFL football game played in Philadelphia; an NCAA Football National Championship game played in Atlanta, Georgia; and a Phish concert in Philadelphia, in June 2018.
Case No. 2:19-cr-0055 (RBS) (Tucker et al.)
Mustafa Tucker, 36, Malik Brown, 38, Kevin Sadat, 41, all of Philadelphia, are charged in a single indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods; and trafficking in counterfeit goods. This indictment alleges that the defendants obtained copies of Ferguson-printed counterfeit tickets from Smith, advertised counterfeit tickets online, and sold tickets to unsuspecting victims. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired with Smith, Ferguson, and others to traffic in counterfeit tickets to Super Bowl LI and the NBA All-Star Game played in New Orleans, Louisiana. It further alleges that Brown trafficked in counterfeit goods by selling tickets to the following events: a Phish concert held in Philadelphia in June 2018, the 1916-2016 Copa America Centenario soccer game played in Philadelphia, and a Philadelphia Eagles-Atlanta Falcons game in Philadelphia, on September 8, 2018.
Case No. 2:19-cr-0056 (RBS) (Dunmore)
Edward Dunmore, 61, of Philadelphia, was charged with two counts of trafficking in counterfeit goods. The indictment alleges that on two occasions, Dunmore sold tickets to a Phish concert in Philadelphia, in June 2018.
“Criminal counterfeiting and piracy are serious crimes,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain. “When fans spend their hard-earned money on tickets and merchandise, they deserve the real deal. These defendants repeatedly targeted events based on profitability and perpetrated a fraud on unsuspecting fans. These indictments send a clear message that phony ticket sales are a federal case – one that we will pursue to the fullest extent of the law.”
“This case grew out of the public safety partnership between FBI Philadelphia's special events program, the NFL, and the Philadelphia Eagles,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Philadelphia Division. “But as the scope of the investigation expanded nationwide, it truly became a collaboration, and for that I'd like to thank all of our law enforcement partners. There were no less than 30 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies and 23 FBI field offices that directly contributed on this case, allowing us to achieve our ultimate goal of protecting the ticket-buying public.”
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Philadelphia Police Department, New York Police Department, with assistance from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia, the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, and multiple local law enforcement authorities, including the Duluth, Georgia Police Department. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Joan Burnes and Anita Eve.
An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.